Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Note: For a radically different view of Lincoln, the abolitionists, and the Civil War, you might want to read THE SOUTH WAS RIGHT by James Ronald Kennedy and Walter Donald Kennedy.

And if you plan on seeing this latest politically-correct, Hollywood version of Lincoln, just remember the old axiom "History is written by the victors".

1 posted on 11/28/2012 2:03:05 PM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet
I will definitely add that book to my reading list. I am actually not sure what I think of old Lincoln. Seems to me the war was taken to the South because the South wanted to exercise their right to secede from a nation that kept putting the interests of Northern manufacturers (tariffs) above the needs of the South. It also was NOT a CIVIL WAR. This wasn't a war where both sides wanted to control the entire US government. One side simply wanted to leave.

Another liberal movie to avoid - The Rum Diary. Good God that was a liberal bore.

2 posted on 11/28/2012 2:06:23 PM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

One has to remember that there really weren’t a great flood of supporters for Lincoln, from the election in 1860, to the day he was shot. Somehow, after the shooting....Lincoln rose to a legendary lofty position.


3 posted on 11/28/2012 2:08:01 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

This is a review of Lincoln the POTUS, not Lincoln the movie.

The movie clearly showed Lincoln engaging in underhanded vote-buying and it showed a scene where he admitted to extra-Constitutional activity. Many of the Republicans in the movie had issues with Lincoln. I didn’t think it glorified Lincoln at all.

However, it made the democrats look far worse.


4 posted on 11/28/2012 2:12:08 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Spielberg can go fly a kite. Pure Hollywood touchy-feely drivel. I wonder if Spielberg’s Lincoln is ever identified as a Republican? There are a lot of blacks that think he was a Democrat and the Confederacy was run by Republicans.


5 posted on 11/28/2012 2:13:22 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

There’s a treasure trove of info out there on lincoln and the so-called civil war!; much of it online and personal blogs.

Anyone withe the desire for truth should have no problem finding it.

Semper Watching!
*****


6 posted on 11/28/2012 2:13:59 PM PST by gunnyg ("A Constitution changed from Freedom, can never be restored; Liberty, once lost, is lost forever...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


7 posted on 11/28/2012 2:16:00 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

How about a study of why the 1864 Republican Party didn’t exist? They were replaced by the National Union Party which had a Democrat as VP candidate, the Republican VP Hamlin was cast out. They watered down their abolitionism to pick up support of the “War Democrats”.


8 posted on 11/28/2012 2:23:42 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Just remember that Lincoln said, “If I could preserve the Union by freeing all the slaves, some of the slaves, or none of them I would do it”. Lincoln was primarily interested in preserving the Union, not freeing slaves. Anything to the contrary is propaganda. Union soldiers who died by the hundreds of thousands had the same motivation, as did Confederates who were trying to preserve their way of life, not to protect slavery.


10 posted on 11/28/2012 2:31:04 PM PST by NotTallTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I wouldn't go see this revisionist piece of crap even if it was free!

11 posted on 11/28/2012 2:36:36 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Slavery was the issue that made the war inevitable. Both sides were right, and both sides were wrong. The Federals won. Get over it.

I enjoyed the movie.


12 posted on 11/28/2012 2:40:39 PM PST by Daveinyork (."Trusting government with power and money is like trusting teenaged boys with whiskey and car keys,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Spielberg is a hack. Always has been, always will be.

Nothing wrong with being a hack, but hack with pretensions is the worst.

As far as this, what Dave said in 12: “Slavery was the issue that made the war inevitable. Both sides were right, and both sides were wrong. The Federals won. Get over it.” is a good summary.

As far as woulda coulda shoulda, the South ought to have freed the slaves and paid wages. Then seceded. There’d’ve been no moral basis for the North to fight and it’d probably made the Southern economy better.


14 posted on 11/28/2012 2:48:59 PM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I saw the movie with my wife last night and thought it was excellent. Is it an historically accurate portrayal?...kind of.. but despite any shortcomings the acting was great, the costumes and set design fabulous and the story line watchable. I had to chuckle that during the lengthy debate scene in the House of Representatives the Democrats represented the pro-slavery position while the Republicans were pushing the 13th amendment to end slavery. At least Spielberg got that part of history right.


15 posted on 11/28/2012 2:49:50 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

that’s right it is always important to read books about how theSouth was so abused by the evil Lincoln, who after all is a bad man for wanting to keep the union together.

The Civil War was just that....right or not the South lost and hence the union was and is preserved.


21 posted on 11/28/2012 3:07:02 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

40 posted on 11/28/2012 5:06:50 PM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
it doesn’t include the extensive evidence suggesting that Lincoln could be an ambitious, secretive tyrant. A secretive tyrant? Was he a tryant when the door was closed and he was hidng behind the drapes?
80 posted on 11/29/2012 9:37:29 PM PST by turn_to
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson