We don’t know what kind of a weapon (if any) Davis pulled on Dunn. Dunn claims self-defense, but the story is silent about what he was defending against Is this silence intended to make the hooded corpse into another supposedly innocent boy victim?
Yeah, we don’t know anything yet.
This wasn’t a fact based list, or description, it is just a vague outline of something involving a shooting.
We don’t know squat, so it is too early to be drawing up scenarios, taking sides on various scenarios, and drifting into hardened positions as though we have a side to take, we don’t, we don’t know anything at this point.
But you know how these threads go.
Well, yeah. It's exactly the same narrative. Forget the pesky details. Mean old white man with scowl shoots doe eyed honor student. Racism!
The shooter should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
But in my mind, so should the shootee. Maybe he made a motion he shouldn’t have. Maybe the shooter really is that 1 in a million hothead who really will use his concealed weapon for deadly offense. No facts are in evidence.