What’s Chambers going on for that?
“I’m getting credible information of evidence in those states that there enough numbers that are questionable and could have swung the election,” he says. “I’m only putting good credible information on there, like the actual vote counts, reports, and mainstream publications reporting voter fraud." "There are articles people have sent me that don’t hold up. Crazy stuff.”
What’s not crazy? “Things like the 59 voting divisions of Philadelphia where Romney received zero votes,” says Chambers. “Even Larry Sabato said that should be looked into.”
Wisconsin, Nevada, Iowa and Colorado should be on that map... if not more.
If they were true, the election numbers they spew, why the need for all the vote fraud?
I think Nevada and Colorado should be thrown in there also. IMHO, more illegal aliens voted in Nevada than Nevadans did.
This guy is not doing himself any favors and is digging the hole deeper.
Now they think they have the right to steal our money by over taxing. Steal the election and now steal the money!
And yet, not a peep out of the GOP.
He lists some liberal areas like Arlington County where Obama won 70-30. I happen to work there and it is chock full of young stupid women who have come for the federal money that flows there. Romney had lots of negative ads run against him there I'm just surprised it wasn't more than 70-30.
So, did Republicans lose because we ran a milquetoast Massachusetts liberal who flip-flopped on all his positions while alienating his conservative base or was Mitt Romney truly the victor in this race, only to be denied because of Obama's powerful vote fraud machine (a machine that somehow failed to capture the house or a 60 seat Senate majority).
If the later is true, then shouldn't we keep running more guys like Romney? After all, why mess with success?
FWIW, I don't believe this is true.
If we are to assure honest outcome of elections, we need a bulletproof system in place.
Election after election military ballots are delivered too late or lost before being counted. This must end.
There must be consistency in voting periods. Start and end on the same days... and voting periods must not begin until after all debates are ended. (Or if the “debate” process ends, a set “earliest” date to begin voting.
There must be enforced voting regulations to limit voting to one vote per eligible voter. So, a citizen’s photoID with magnetic strip in conjunction with an eligible voters ID database must exist. Swipe the card, vote once, and you are done. All digital...
This must be backed up with severe penalties for anyone found guilty of attempting/succeeding in voter fraud.
That would be a good start... IMO
Regardless of voter fraud, the GOP as it is today is done unless it can get NY and CA to split electorate votes in a manner similar to Maine and Nebraska.
Compare the congressional ballott totals with the
President ballott totals. There are an extra 300 to 500k of
Presidential ballots in each battleground state. The other non-battleground states match up just fine . The keyword is “groundgame”.
They figured out how to eliminate ACORN. Just keep a record of who voted last time and automatically submit there vote the next time. Oh and make sure the other guy gets Zero votes just in case he might win by one vote.
Looks about right.
something else ive been thinking is a by the color explanation:.
Missouri in 2008 went from red Bush to pink McCain in 08
then went red for Romney. IOW, they saw Obama and said no louder in 12. Soooo.. OH, PA, FL should have gone pinkish to redish NOT the opposite blue what so ever. and maybe some other ‘blue’ states too.
Thats not based on facts (because we are still arguing the facts btw), just logic..
I would definitely include Wisconsin and Iowa on that map.
And who thinks that they’ve “discredited” his web site? Does telling the truth discredit one these days?