Replies

I clicked into the barackofraudo.com website to look at Virginia and it says "Those eight areas are the ones where vote fraud was most likely and they will be the focus of efforts to find any reports and evidence of vote fraud in the state." The eight areas he refers to are cities like Richmond which had some precincts as bad as 1272 to 7 for Obama. Although RIchmond is 40% white, Romney got only 20% of the vote. The main reason, as in much of Virginia, is that blacks turned out more than whites.

He lists some liberal areas like Arlington County where Obama won 70-30. I happen to work there and it is chock full of young stupid women who have come for the federal money that flows there. Romney had lots of negative ads run against him there I'm just surprised it wasn't more than 70-30.

The main reason, as in much of Virginia, is that blacks turned out more than whites.

Really? How do you know that? Blacks nationally were known to have been much less enthusiastic (statistically) about Obama as compared to 2008. If reports from black precincts showed extraordinarily high numbers of blacks voting, you can bet that there were many who voted multiple times under the supervision of, and in some cases, with the inducement of little gifts from, the Obama campaign. (Early voting enables cheating with multiple voting by the same individual.) Plus, the number of votes from those precincts could have been inflated by electronic hacking of optical scanners and centralized vote tabulators.

And why shouldn't whites turn out in numbers to vote against Obama's policies? In fact, it was generally observed that crowds at polls in predominantly white areas around the country were larger than at any election in memory. (Yes, this is only anecdotal.)