Congratulations to Jim Robinson for His Political Sagacity Overwhelmingly Accurate

[lbryce]

Hello! Hi! Kevmo! Where have you been? I've enjoyed our exchanges and wanted to continue where we left off, wanting to respond to the query you've been relentlessly summoning me to discuss, seemed desperate to have me talk about. But then, poof! You're gone without a trace back to where you came from, wherever that is, never to be heard from again.

I'd love to hear from you! Am ready, willing and able to answer all your questions. Please respond. Thanks!

[Kevmo]

Just a few posts ago, you log on to tell me why you didn’t answer the question, but you don’t answer the question.

Now more bowlsheet... “But then, poof! You’re gone without a trace back to where you came from, wherever that is, never to be heard from again.”
***Just answer the contentions that are posted directly to you.

I’d love to hear from you! Am ready, willing and able to answer all your questions. Please respond.
***You have heard from me and you’ve ignored my contentions. Why do I have to respond to get you to answer my questions? You’re playing some kind of backtracking game. I can understand why, after posting a sycophant thread that turns out to have a completely invalid and opposite premise. That’s gotta be embarrassing. And then poof! You’re gone without a trace and now it’s just obfuscation techniques from you.

[lbryce]

Thanks for your reply.

I have not as much made reference to you personally in the the slightest. I have not insulted, maligned or even made the slightest comment that might be construed in a negative vein about you.

You on the other hand have pulled no punches in maligning, impugning me, taking quotes from my posts I've written in the past, re-posted, taken way out of context, to have it convey the worst things I have never said or meant for reasons I will never understand. Everything, all that I've received from you remain inexplicable, for the way you've mercilessly attacked me personally in the worst way. Why? I have not a clue but will leave at that.

You are very good at what you do. You used most of the comments I made in my last response to you in your response to me.

Well, As the point for your luring me to FR to bare my soul has been rendered moot, as I understand it, I understand why you have responded with my very own words. Because you have nothing to say. The non-response-response. Despite all that, I'd like to end our communication on a good, positive note as a fellow FR wishing you the very best of luck in all you future endeavors.

All the Very Best to You.

Sincerely,
Leon Bryce

[Kevmo]

I understand why you have responded with my very own words. Because you have nothing to say. The non-response-response.
***Just look through your own recent posts to see non-response-responses. I can understand why, because you are embarrassed.

[lbryce]

Your co-conspirator, HannibalHamlinJr, has been zotted. Be careful who you harass. You just might be next.

[SarahPalinForPresident2012]

Alone among political observers of weight did Jim Robinson berate Romney as the wrong choice — JR has more brains in his little finger than the whole of the GOP.

[Las Vegas Ron]

KMA

[Triple]

“None of the other candidates who ran would’ve beaten Obama. “ - NJ

Wow, you are good. Written with full confidence...

(There is no possible way for you to back up this bold assertion. You are just pulling it out of...thin air.)

[aruanan]

In the end, months after the controversy had died down,the election of 2012 having ended, it comes as no surprise to have ended in the manner in which Mr. Robinson did all that he could and more, the sagacity and prescience in which he had already determined the outcome to the election is one in which should teach us all not to repeat the mistakes of the past and to heed those we have faith and admiration for in their reading of the political map and and its various minefields.

Thanks for the sagacity of giving us another 4 years of Obama.

[lbryce]

Is English a language you speak and understand? The sentence contains all English words but makes no sense at all when written out the way you did.

Should I read it from left to right? or right to left? I'd say, you yourself are not a native speaker of English and neither do you understand the meaning of a single word of English. It seems you used a language translator, like Google Translate, where you submit your own foreign language into the blank field, probably one that uses a foreign alphabet, and had it translated into English. But for most languages it doesn't translate very well sounding like the gibberish you posted here. I think I get it now. Reading it from right to left like Hebrew or Arabic it does convey some sort of message. Let's see.

Obama of years 4 another us giving of sagacity the for Thanks.

To make things easier for you I'll write my response from right to left the way you do it in your native language so you understand it better.

now it get I Yes (Right to Left)

idiot complete and total a are you