Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: barryobi

Staying quiet on Benghazi was a bet. It seemed right at the time, but it turned out to be a mistake. Could Romney have lost any worse if he had pounded Obamugabe on it?!


84 posted on 11/06/2012 9:49:14 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Revolting cat!

It was a lose-lose situation on Benghazi. If he continued blasting away on Benghazi, the media would take it as him simply being obssessed and hateful about Obama instead of wanting to be president. Second, if he moved on, the media would pound any number of lies they wished on the whole ordeal. The other issue, which I take to people thinking other candidates could have done better, is the fact that frankly, they all had their own lousy performances in debate and along the campaign trail.


109 posted on 11/06/2012 10:07:45 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson