Posted on 10/30/2012 3:40:48 PM PDT by Morgana
Washington, D.C., October 30, 2012 (LifeSiteNews) Pro-contraception activist Sandra Fluke, on a speaking tour for Barack Obamas re-election campaign, continues to parrot the Obama administrations party line that children are one of the biggest roadblocks to womens success.
Equality, Fluke said in an October 15 interview with the Cornell Daily Sun, means the ability to control your reproduction so that that a career is a realistic goal and something that can be achieved and not derailed by a baby.
Fluke, the Georgetown law school student who stepped into the limelight earlier this year after she was blocked from testifying at a hearing on religious freedom and the Obama administrations HHS mandate, also said she does not believe she is entitled to contraception.
Instead, she said, I think the case is much more about what kind of society do we want to live in.
If we think about what contraception means for people, its not only about having access to the health care that you need, and the human rights aspects of having access to health care, but its also about what being able to control your own reproduction does for women specifically, but for men as well.
Fluke has been an ardent supporter of the Obama administrations plan to force all employers, including many religious employers, to pay for their employees birth control. She was widely ridiculed in the conservative press after testifying at a Democrat press conference that contraception costs thousands of dollars and poses a financial burden to law students such as herself. She later admitted that she didnt realize that contraceptives were available for $9 a month at Target, including the Target down the street from Georgetown.
The idea of babies as barriers to achievement is not a new one for the Obama team. Obama himself famously said during his 2008 campaign that if his daughters, then 9 and 6, made a mistake, he wouldnt want them punished with a baby.
Other administration officials have argued in court that contraception is vital to improving the health of women so that women who choose to do so can be part of the workforce on an equal playing field with men.
But according to conservative commentator George Will, the educated, career-oriented women Obamas campaign is targeting with his War on Women rhetoric are the ones most offended by it. Will said on ABCs This Week with George Stephanopoulos that the Obama campaigns fixation on abortion and contraceptive access has provoked a backlash from educated women because it implies they only care about personal, sexual issues, not critical national issues like the struggling economy and complicated foreign relations.
There has been a big change its not a particular state, said Will. Its the change in Romneys gain among women, and that I think represents a huge recoil by professional women with college degrees against the condensation of the Obama campaign which says, essentially, dont you trouble your pretty little heads about these mens issues and all the rest. Worry about contraception, which has been a constitutional right for 47 years.
Its a distraction, Will added, the entire war on women trope, and I think professional educated women find it offensive.
Too bad Sandra Fluke’s mother when she conceived her didn’t get rid of that “Barrier”
A. Her ankles
There are really only a few ~ and they are very old ~ basically, to eat. Another is to defend one's self. Another is to defend your loved ones.
Fluke is delusional if she really thinks getting ahead in life is a justification for killing others.
Ew...
Sandra, did you ever think of keeping your knees together?
no one has ever denied fluke contraception. what she wants is for others to pay for it...
Ew. Her looks and personality should work just FINE as birth control.
(ok, ahem...sorry...)
This is one sick, sick woman.
She is anti-baby if she says things like that
“Anti-Baby Activist” is her new title
Will she get disaster relief dollars for contraceptives?
Id this dummy still around? She does nothing but embarrass herself.
Remember when we were upset by “Punished with a baby?”
We should KILL those evil barriers!
Is that anything like yoga??
She is anti-baby if she says things like that
“Anti-Baby Activist” is her new title
Instead, she said, I think the case is much more about what kind of society do we want to live in.
I agree. Some of us want a kind of society where babies are not considered disposable, like so much worthless trash. Some of us want a kind of society where the most innocent and vulnerable among us are protected and valued. But others like Sandra Fluke see children as inconveniences without value and whose right to exist is irrelevant because their right to destroy the life within them always trumps the child’s right to live.
“Will she get disaster relief dollars for contraceptives?”
Sure. It’s a new federal program called “No Child Left At All”
Did she ever used to be a man?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.