Do you know what their ‘rationale’ is for changing the weighted average?
Uh, to keep the not close, to too close to call.
What would be the obvious? I am not trying to sound ugly, please forgive if I do.
They claim they don’t include party affiliation as a factor in deciding the composition of the sample. They just ask voters (registered or likely) and the sample just turns out that way.
Wow. You verified the democrat over sampling?
If so, that’s just bizarre. They just keep upping the Ds in every poll to make sure Romney stays down. Going to be some shocked lefties on Nov 6th lol
It is the same old game. If Republicans are winning most polls will show it a neck and neck race until the last week when they have to get their numbers to look sort of accurate so next election they can point to that last week and say see how accurate we were.
If a dem is winning they always show it.
The problems for the republican in reading polls before the last week of the election is deciding whether the republican is winning or is it close (which usually means a republican win).
If this thing was even 1 point win for Obama the media would be shouting it from the rooftops.