Posted on 10/24/2012 12:17:19 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen
Something doesn't smell right.
There were protests or riots in what looks to be perhaps 100 cities around the world.
Every participant, when asked, just parrots "the video". It was reported on September 15 that some in Cairo were paid to protest.
These protests and attacks were obviously coordinated by muslim leaders throughout the world, i.e., what they planned for this 9/11 anniversary. You simply don't get protests in dozens of cities all parroting the same reason, without some coordination and management.
There are thousands of youtube videos that are offensive to islam, and they have been posted for years, so this video is nothing new that is not already out there.
Clearly, the protest organizers planned to use the video as their false flag "offense" that "triggered" protests and at least the protestors were told this; perhaps others were as well.
Now we come to the Admininstration. Some very simple web searching turns up reports that the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, responding to the video which was aired on the Egyptian network al-Nas on September 8, published a statement condemning the video. This is the infamous statement that was no longer available on their website by September 13. Key point: it was posted proactively, before the Cairo protest/attack started. The State Department was aware of at least that protest before it started. How many more were they aware of before they started ?
What really is starting to make me think is that there appears to be no reason for the White House, State Department and CIA to highlight the video as a cause for the Libyan Consulate attack and the consequent murder and/or assassination of Ambassador Stevens, as opposed to saying they were not sure of the cause. Saying you don't know is the standard response until an administration runs things up the management chain and decides on a response. There seems to be even less of a purpose to them sticking with the video in the ensuing weeks. We know now that hundreds in the government received the terror attack emergency broadcast emails in realtime. Everyone in the administration would had to have been aware that they were to keep silent about the emergency email, and simply parrot the "video" story when talking to the news media.
It's almost as if someone had, prior to the attacks, directed throughout the White House, State Departement and CIA that the video was going to be used as the cause. How else could everyone been kept quiet about the emergency emails and simply parrot a lie with the press clamoring for a story ? It's almost as if such phantom order has taken quite some time to be rescinded, as well. The hypothetical order would make sense of why the pResident made the statements he did at the U.N. on September 25, that is, if that was an objective from the start, to get that speech in the media or on the record. Other than that, the speech was spectacularly off the wall, since most everyone by then had discounted the video as a false flag.
Such a hypothetical "outside origin" order is the only scenario that I can think of that would cause the White House, the State Department and the CIA to all speak so irrationally and all in the same parroting fashion.
It also dawned on me that Ambassador Stevens was our "point man" in Libya, and was undboubtedly aware of the movements of various arms and who knows what or who into and out of Libya. It was reported that he had not been to Benghazi for a couple weeks and came in for these meetings scheduled on September 11. The last visitor he saw was a representative from Turkey. Why would the meeting need to take place on the 11th ? Did he select the date or his visitors or his bosses at the State Department ? It did not seem to make much sense to go to the terror hotbed on the anniversary of 9/11 with almost no security against a major attack. It seems about as nonsensical to go there as some cheesy horror film where everyone is yelling at the screen. Why would he go there on that day ? Would or did his State Department bosses tell him to avoid that day and stay in Tripoli ?
He must have thought that he was at the center of everything and knew the players involved and the situation, however, perhaps we should note that Turkey, Syria, Libya and the U.S. all have leaders that could be talking to each other through mediators other than him or perhaps directly. Whatever the Ambassador knew about what was going on, we may never know. His assassination certainly would be a way to ensure his silence if any of the parties involved had desired it. Perhaps having almost no security there for him would a) help ensure the success of the assassination and b) keep the loss of American lives to a small number, which would make it less of an issue than if 20 or 30 were lost additionally.
This does not do the Obama campaign any good unless the attack was thwarted, so it's highly doubtful that the White House had any sway over the attacks prior to them happening. While they may have been forewarned, they certainly were not architected the way the White House would have wanted.
The State Department clearly looks terrible and this does nothing to help any political future for Hitlery.
IMHO, it does not appear that the timing or other details were controlled in any way by the administration. But it's hard to see, with the nonsensical video story - which the left wing media is also dutifully doing everything it can to keep alive (see various left wing websites) - where the administration does not appear to be marching to someone else's orders that seem perfectly orchestrated with media coverage from the moment the video first aired on Egyptian TV.
Here’s the thing, and we’ve known this for a *long* time. Foreseen the milestones, even.
BILL CLINTON is the original Obama-owner. You will note that every Obama admin kingpin is a former Bill Clinton critter.
Now, Soros. Soros is a wholly owned Clinton creature, too. Finance, yes - but he’s under orders.
We (Mesta, to be precise) always predicted that we would see an all out split between the Clintons and their loyalists on one side, and Obama and the ones electing to follow him on the other side. Greg Craig was the Clinton control with Obama, and he split in Jan 2010. From then on, the two factions have been at de facto war.
Bill Clinton is running the left by means of 50 or so different foundations, one of the best known would be Center for American Progress, but these are many and not all obviously connected. And new ones are sprouting almost daily.
And here’s just a quick look at how diverse the Clinton foundations actually are. haven’t checked them today, but that reproductive justice thing is for selecting executives for the central Clinton foundations.
http://www.americanprogress.org/
http://nationalcleanenergyproject.org/
http://boldprogressives.org/ - may have gone off w Obie
http://www.teapartytracker.org/
http://thinkprogress.org/
http://reproductivejustice.org/
http://www.bioneers.org/
There’s a gazillion more ;).
It’s all staged with this moron.
Just like the debate,
Oblamer: “Get the transcript Candy!”
Candy: “Oh me, oh my! I just happen to have it right here in my fat little sweaty hands!”
Add the $70,000 Hillary spent trumpeting the cartoonish video, the faux catalyst for this tragedy, all over the MEast. It could almost be said the State Dept and WH were stirring it up for more of the same.
Then the bad guy is giving interviews at a streetside cafe, still in Benghazi, enjoying a slurpee and mocking Obama bluster about bringing the attackers to justice. He said even the local in-charges haven’t troubled him for questioning.
Why is he so unafraid? Curious what is coming next in leaks as this seems big to me and suspect it will have something to do with arms.
The following is an educated guess as to what happened, how it happened, and what the probable motives from a US operational standpoint as I see the administration in its execution of American Interests abroad...
The administration implemented Social Media under the operational control of Public Affairs. This consisted of using each embassy/consulate as a Internet focal point to enlist local nationals from the host country as friends, using Face Book and other media such as Twitter, or whatever the popular alternative was within that country or region.
The Administration utilized Twitter to mobilize its voters in 2008, again in 2010, and transferred the campaigns direct operation control operators into the DoS Public Affairs leadership. They have stood up a major operation using a building adjacent to Main State in DC and it is from there that global operations are contemplated, then farmed out to the local offices.
During my last tour before going into Brazil as an IT guy or what we call a communicator, I was sent to the PA and asked to assist them, unofficially of course, but as a professional courtesy to help the PA folks with their IT problems if they arise. What they asked was nothing out of the ordinary, however, they did try to enlist gage my interest, and being a good State person I knew to feign excitement so that they felt more comfortable in closing the sales pitch to a like minded ally in the field. The crux of Public Affairs operations is that they can do several things, one of which is to FLASH information to subscribers, another to alert Americans in country, and they can stir the pot which is the ultimate goal of PA ops, e.g., influence local opinion.
The US Department of State FLASHED to the Islamic world the VIDEO INSULT and this is where the story grew legs.
Anyone investigating this Administration (Incident) needs to start right across the street from Main State and get those files and the list of people who worked in PA in both DC and within the consulates/embassies. This will expose the ugly truth. The Video story was planted in the local countries to support a narrative. That narrative never was ment to be internally political to the President but for the Country engaged in activities linked to overall US Mid East Policy.
This was a excellent cover for the Gun Running Operation that blew up and if anything the fall out will be minimal as it was probably not illegal to deal with Al Quada affiliates to run guns from Libyas former military into Syria/Lebanon/the Saini, etc. Unless of course the president in his duality role representing America as a practitioner of Islam/Islamic upbringing in those parts of the world is not credible - which I believe today is the case and thus Romney will replace Obama. We gave the War on Terror an Islamic President which during whose tenure Islam failed to grasp the opportunity to work with America; they will now have to deal with another Christian Representative who will have less credibility than Obama had in his upbringing, but through strength Romney and America will no longer coddle Islam as was official US policy the past 4-years. It was all coordinated to give Islam a chance, and they missed that Olive Branch from the Executive Branch. God help them.
This entire State Department (Langley Boys Sp Op) and Public Affairs (can you say sister agency again?) blew up. The Ambassador was not what he appeared, nor was the Consulate manned to handle Counselor Affairs which is the primary function of said missions abroad.
Post/thread BUMP!
Have you tried to contact Rep Issa with this? Your speculation sounds plausible to me. It at least provides some explanation of how a You Tube video that no one had seen suddenly loomed so large.
I did. It had all of the plot, continuity, and production values of the 8mm film some friends and I put together for a high school class assignment 40 years ago. Anyone that got homicidally outraged by it needs to have his head examined. Seriously.
Consider the embassy in Cairo apologized BEFORE the demonstration began. The whole thing was coordinated from the White Hut.
this does provide an explanation of the seemingly incomprehensible statements by obama, hillary and rice
other than hillary, I wonder if the other 2 are even sophisticated enough to understand the implications of
what they attempted to unleash?
So this operation would be the antithesis of Radio Free Europe or VOA, but a way of rapidly dispersing anti-american propaganda and faux apologia into a volatile arab street. Then in the best Alinksy training, never fail to use a crisis for political gain. Except 4 American embassy workers paid the brutal blood price
(PS: Would that be Maine Avenue, not Main Street?)
Hillary and Stanley Ann had some things in common
Plain unremarkable women with emotionally distant daddys,
who compensated by developing an exaggerated sense of their own “intelligence”, scorning the establishment, and picking up audience among similar disaffected losers
the ambitious Hillary scored an ambitious slick talking liberal lawyer politician-wannabe from Arkansas and Stanley slept with any exotic man whom found his way between her legs
It makes no sense to me that we would send Stevens anywhere in the region so poorly guarded. The claim that we wanted to posture that terrorism was no longer a threat doesn't hold with me. The voters don't care what happens in Benghazi, and the Press certainly wouldn't have made ANY negative connection to anything 0bama does.
Recall that CNN had their people on site long before the FBI gained access for their post-attack investigation.
CNN was compelled to defend their report on the contents of the Ambassador's 'diary' which was obtained by CNN's reporters hours after seige.
Earlier speculations about an October surprise involving a pre-planned kidnapping/rescue mission to boost Barry's pre-election foreign policy credentials appear increasingly plausible.
Bill Ayers and his fellow terrorist wife are also involved in all of this, too. Remember the Palestinian ship? They were organizing protests aimed at undermining Israel and some of the same people were involved with ginning up the Arab spring in Cairo. I see Ayers at the center of this whole debacle. Where are the investigative reporters? Oh, yes. I remember. They’re all pushing the Big Lie from the Obama Administration.
And no, I do not think the video had any government connection but rather it was a crass attempt to whip up hysteria by Obama's team.
Fox reported the trip as being from Qatar to Saudi Arabia to Turkey.
Interestingly, Iran is apparently accepting payment in gold for their oil, since they are out of the SWIFT system.
Reuters reports that Turkish gold apparently has been heading to Iran in exchange for oil and gas. In August, the direct trade apparently fell off because of too much publicity, and Dubai became an intermediary.
I would think that Holder was there trying to put a stop to the flow.
The Assad regime, like the others that were toppled, is targeted simply because all regimes that are not the new muslim revolutionaries are targeted.
At David Horowitz’s site, this article: http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977 does a good job of listing many places to read about George Soros’ goals and organizations. Just try taking at a look at things right from the horse’s mouth: visit http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/ or read Georgie’s books, “The Bubble of American Supremacy” and “Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism”.
He’s been backing revolutions going back to the 1990’s and is well known for his backing of revolutions to effect regime change.
The “Arab Spring” has Soros written all over it, especially since the Democratic “shadow party” he runs includes Hillary and therefore the State Department.
Campaign finance reform was his brainchild and was engineered to enable him to bankroll his media/Democrat influence agenda.
The sheer number of non-profit influence organizations and people employed by them is astounding - these are must-reads; he is the big man behind the 1960’s radicals that have enormous political power at this point. Revolutions will not stop as long as the organizations Soros started continue to successfully operate.
Who would have benefited (e.g. Obama, the Muslim Brotherhood) and what would those benefits have been (e.g. improve Obama's reelection chances, release of the blind sheik, control criticism of Islam)?
There is indeed much more to this!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.