Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Unretouched Images Victoria’s Secret Doesn’t Want You to See
Jezebel ^ | Oct 17, 2012 | Jenna Sauers

Posted on 10/22/2012 8:33:30 AM PDT by jwsea55

Back in August, Victoria's Secret accidentally published a set of two dozen raw, unretouched images from a photo shoot with supermodel Doutzen Kroes. Although we had to take down the unretouched images from our post after some kind of legal crap from VS, we knew the publication of the retouched versions in the brand's catalog was only a matter of time. And now we can show you all the images, both before and after the VS airbrush job.

Many of the differences between the retouched and raw photographs are not terribly shocking. There aren't any missing limbs, or drastic alterations to the shape of Kroes' body — she's a supermodel, after all, and the woman sure knows how to pose. This is, to be honest, mostly pretty subtle, "good" Photoshop. The biggest change by far is that Victoria's Secret brightened up the colors and corrected for lighting conditions that had some of the raw shots looking a little washed-out or dull. Now, it comes as no great surprise that a company should want its products to be seen in the best light possible, even if that is the magical, fake, golden light of Photoshop. An advertiser using lies to make a product seem more alluring than it really is? Well, I never!

But it's still interesting to see exactly what changed — and what didn't — during Victoria's Secret's post-production process. The retouching of women's bodies in advertising is normally intended to be invisible: it takes advantage of the presumed objectivity of photography but instead gives us an image that has been highly manipulated. The standards to which images are edited vary from brand to brand and magazine to magazine, and in a world where virtually every image of a woman we ever see...

(Excerpt) Read more at jezebel.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Society
KEYWORDS: doutzenkroes; jezebel; photoshop; victoriasecrets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

bfl


21 posted on 10/22/2012 9:46:41 AM PDT by zeugma (Rid the world of those savages. - Dorothy Woods, widow of a Navy Seal, AMEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55

IBTHTP

In Before The Helen Thomas Picture...


22 posted on 10/22/2012 10:17:17 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
Yeah, I don't get the whole looks-like-a-10-year-old-boy thing. Like athletic girls, with curves.


23 posted on 10/22/2012 11:35:34 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (I will never vote for Romney. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55
Victoria's Secret beauties:


24 posted on 10/22/2012 11:40:11 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!; Slings and Arrows; Daffynition; Lazamataz
Of course the catalog photos were shooped. They have to write the word SEX all over the waves and clouds and glasses of iced beverage.


25 posted on 10/22/2012 10:49:51 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson