Eye-witness testimony is NOT hearsay. If it were, we’d almost never convict anyone in court. Hearsay is just that...someone testifying they heard someone else saying something.
The eye-witness testimony of 26+ ex team mates, employees, trainers, etc. etc. aren’t enough?
What dream world are you living in?
When technology is available to provide an absolute answer, why accept sworn testimony?
Sounds like you still believe Bubba Clinton’s sworn testimony when he was lying to a Federal judge.
LOL - you trolls rejecting absolute evidence based on technology are such a hoot!