Ronald Reagan had a core set of principles that he stood on and would not move from. Can you honestly say the same about Romney?
The choice between Romney and Obama is like a choice between a broken leg and lung cancer. Yeah, I'm going to choose the broken leg, but I'm not going to be happy about it and all things considered I'd rather not have either one. And I'm also not going to forget it and plan on making sure that in 2016 I'm not faced with the same kind of choice all over again. And the way to do that is to nominate an actual conservative for the presidency in 2016 and make Romney the first sitting president since Chester Arthur to be denied his party's nomination for re-election.
That wasn’t the argument. What Laissez-faire seemed to be suggesting was that it was somehow ‘wrong’ for Romney to talk to different segments of the electorate, which is simply idiotic.
At the end of the day, it doesn’t matter whether you like or dislike Romney, what matters is how you vote, and if you vote for Gary Johnson (as this guy is doing), all you’re doing is giving a vote to Barry so you can have a wet dream over how principled you were. It’s annoying, and the continual posting of these same “I hate Romney and am voting third party because I have more values than anybody” threads is getting stale.
In 2012, he could have tossed his hat in the Republican primary. Instead, in February (when who would be the Repub nominee was unknown) he chose to take the Constitution Party nomination, in order to ensure that, whoever won the Republican nomination, he could split the conservative vote to defeat the Republican.
No thanks. This guy is a Dem plant.
Romney is who we have, for better or worse. If Romney betrays us, then he will have a challenger in the 2016 primary.
YES!
They may NOT be reported, but I'm am QUITE sure he has them!
For an example, has it EVER been reported where he has spoken of the vows he has taken in a MORMON temple?