Saying that you post all negative articles about the police, isn't an accusation. It's a fact supported by your posting history on FR.
Asking you to come up with a court case to support your opinion on constitutionality and your failure to do so is also a fact.
Selective reading of my posting history is not factual.
Your failure to defend the actions of these police on that which is written in the Constitution or on the basis of Robert Peel’s principles is factual.
Your attempts to change the subject to be about anything other than the unconstitutional behavior of these officers are evidence of your inability to defend them using either the written text of the Constitution or Robert Peel’s principles.