Selective reading of my posting history is not factual.
Your failure to defend the actions of these police on that which is written in the Constitution or on the basis of Robert Peel’s principles is factual.
Your attempts to change the subject to be about anything other than the unconstitutional behavior of these officers are evidence of your inability to defend them using either the written text of the Constitution or Robert Peel’s principles.
How many negative stories have you posted about the police versus positive? You're welcome to clear up the facts at any time.
Your attempts to change the subject to be about anything other than the unconstitutional behavior
Feel free to provide a court case to back up your otherwise biased opinion.