Hey Rage....
what did you expect, really?????
I do not even watch these damn things anymore, because the bias is so blatant that it just makes the blood boil..
Why do the pubs continue to fall into this trap? Why do they not name a moderator of their choosing in at least one of the debates?
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result each time...
Now, if Mark Levin is chosen to be a moderator, or even John Stossel, I might watch...
of course, pigs would have to fly first..
See, though, I actually expected different.
CNN *seems* to be migrating slowly to the right, probably to capture the demographic that Fox News is quickly abandoning.
And Candy Crowsfeet *seemed* to be slightly fair when covering McCain in 2008.
So, I figured the Head Honchos at CNN might have taken CC aside and said, “Stay neutral, fatty,” and she might have done it.
I was prepared to be pleasantly surprised. Instead, I am NOT surprised.
If CNN wants us after all, THEY NEED TO LOSE MS. PORKBELLYFUTURES.
Joe, I think that for all future debates it would be completely fair for each side to be able to “voir dire” up to 5 so-called moderators they think would be unfairly biased toward their opponent, then select 10 names that they’d find acceptable and compare the lists. If there are enough names that show up on both lists, those are the moderators. If there aren’t enough mutually acceptable names, a random draw can be used based on the criterion that no single network would be allowed to moderate more than one debate.