Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A massive and illegal geoengineering project has been detected off Canada’s west coast
io9 ^ | 16 Oct 2012 | George Dvorsky

Posted on 10/16/2012 10:44:29 AM PDT by Theoria

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Rebelbase

HA HA HA! I win! I win!... now what?

21 posted on 10/16/2012 11:48:08 AM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

so the UN rules the world now?


22 posted on 10/16/2012 11:50:45 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost; montag813

Only one black guy in the entire movie and they make him wear a full metal mask and costume


23 posted on 10/16/2012 11:51:44 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Hopey changey low emission unicorns and a crap sandwich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

This could turn out good or really bad
“ Some red tides are associated with the production of natural toxins, depletion of dissolved oxygen or other harmful effects, and are generally described as harmful algal blooms. The most conspicuous effects of these kind of red tides are the associated wildlife mortalities of marine and coastal species of fish, birds, marine mammals, and other organisms.”

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_tide


24 posted on 10/16/2012 11:52:58 AM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (Ignorance is bliss- I'm stoked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

The culprit in this case is not even the global warming alarmists, it is the legal translation of their alarms into carbon-credit financial schemes.

Greed is not fiction, but it always requires opportunity and often truly free markets don’t create opportunities for it as much as does government meddling that creates artificial economic advantages. Wherever the government steps in, opportunity for greed and then greed itself often follows.


25 posted on 10/16/2012 11:54:33 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

Screw the U.N.
U.S. out of the U.N.,
U.N. out of the U.S.


26 posted on 10/16/2012 11:56:15 AM PDT by Fireone (Impeach and imprison, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“The end result will likely be something of a population explosion among fish.”

I wonder how long the 100 tons of iron sulfate will last? So yes, more fish for awhile. But the “right” fish? And in the meantime does the natural rhythm and locations, etc. of commercial fish get disrupted? (Like the normal salmon fisheries being near the coast - but now 200 miles out of reach by the fishermen?). I have no idea on fishing, biology, etc.

But hope these guys looked into stuff more than just “Hey - ya know all that iron sulfate waste we’ve been paying to get hauled away? Lets dump it in the ocean somewhere and watch plankton grow.”

OTOH- if it works well - great! As another poster said, I guess we’ll find out. And as long as the guys waits to see what happens without dumping more and more in, whatever bad (or good) effects the stuff has will no doubt be limited in time and extent.


27 posted on 10/16/2012 12:00:25 PM PDT by 21twelve (So I [God] gave them over to their stubborn hearts to follow their own devices. Psalm 81:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

VERY well put!!


28 posted on 10/16/2012 12:03:32 PM PDT by 21twelve (So I [God] gave them over to their stubborn hearts to follow their own devices. Psalm 81:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
that's 10,000 square kilometers (6,214 square miles) in size.

10,000 square kilometers is only 3,821 square miles.

29 posted on 10/16/2012 12:06:06 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

wouldn’t it make more sense to spread the iron across the ocean than in one spot??


30 posted on 10/16/2012 12:06:44 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AndyTheBear

3861 actually...not 3821 (typo)


31 posted on 10/16/2012 12:07:28 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Well if the motivation is carbon credit cash...then I am not so confident they have looked into to it carefully.


32 posted on 10/16/2012 12:09:26 PM PDT by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

How does this differ from our agencies deciding which animals are worthy of reintroduction into our wilderness lands? A private company chose to do this rather than get it approved by the Heritage Program beforehand?

Introducing wolf breeds to the forests or sinking a ship to encourage a coral reef to grow are similar, aren’t they? Many of our lakes have annual algae over growths due to fertilizers runoffs. Man messing with nature or should I say experimenting?


33 posted on 10/16/2012 12:47:49 PM PDT by B4Ranch (Stand Up and Be Counted ... Or Line Up and Be Numbered ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
Critics say it is a "blatant violation" of United Nations rules...

FU, UN! We'll make our own rules.

34 posted on 10/16/2012 3:11:07 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theoria

But isn’t this just the typical activity found in any free market system?


35 posted on 10/16/2012 3:23:25 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Bravo!

Thank goodness someone began to experiment.

CO2 is GOING to go up. India, China, et al, could care less what the environazis want. They will use coal because it is cheaper.

I think AGW is a hoax at present. However, there could be effects when CO2 is much higher.

Locking carbon up in plankton and sea life is a great idea.

If we discover problems, we can just stop the fertilization. Nature has run this experiment in many areas where land minerals are washed into the ocean and set off rapid growth of plankton.


36 posted on 10/16/2012 4:46:43 PM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: veracious

Much the same scenario has occurred to me.

If this scheme works (sequesters large quantities of carbon), it could be worse than anything Goldfinger, Dr. Evil, Lex Luthor, or the Joker could come up with. Taken to extreme (and given the perverse incentives, and whack job characters involved, why wouldn’t it be taken to extreme?) it could trigger a new ice age. For once, the UN got something right. This madness needs to be stopped.


37 posted on 10/18/2012 4:27:07 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Sorry, but, the UN never gets anything right.


38 posted on 10/23/2012 11:48:22 PM PDT by exnavy (The time is upon us, fish or cut bait, may God guide your heart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; fanfan; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ...
Note: this topic is from 10/16/2012. Thanks Theoria.

39 posted on 02/03/2013 11:45:31 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson