To: Uncle Chip
Maybe it is because he passed every drug test given him with the standards at the time.
We have a bunch of team mates saying he doped. OK, what were the results of the scientific drug test for that specific race?
We have to factor in eyewitness hearsay vrs clinical test results.
Until Lance is clinically proven to have doped against the standards at the time it is all BS.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I think its been firmly established that those tests had more holes than Swiss cheese. Plus direct testimony (and there seems to be plenty of it by credible witnesses) is not hearsay.
6 posted on
10/13/2012 8:41:21 AM PDT by
Catphish
To: where's_the_Outrage?
"We have to factor in eyewitness hearsay vrs clinical test results."
There's no such thing as eyewitness heresay.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Maybe it is because he passed every drug test given him with the standards at the time.
You've fallen for Armstrong's propaganda. He's failed a few. I can recommend a book if you would like to read up on what's happening.
35 posted on
10/13/2012 10:10:09 AM PDT by
Vision
("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson