LOL! The Title to this article should win an award!
The town meeting participants will be undecided voters ....Ahhh, yes. Those without a clue. Libs.
OK, I read it as undecided voters who were being sued by the Kenyan.
So these so called undecideds are undecided about whether to vote for Barak or for Obama? I am I getting this right?
I don’t think it should just be undecideds who get to ask questions. I wonder if anyone will ask about the death of our Ambassador. Well I guess I won’t be tuning in I already know who I am voting for since I am not undecided.
Either these “Undecideds are a bunch of idiots or LIARS
It will be a cakewalk for Romney if he instructs his team to get practice questioners (interns, spouses of staffers) and give them the most outrageous, entitlement-minded, tug-at-the-heartstrings, wounded doe-eye liberal slop questions to ask him. Over and over until he is numbed from the shock of them and has solid answers for each. It will be like taking an exam. Liberals are evil, but not all that imaginative.
Think:
“I graduated with a degree in basket-weaving habits of 8th Century lesbians. Now I’m $150,000 in debt. Wahhh?”
“I live in Detroit, and everyone knows the biggest problem we face there is global warming. Why do you hate green energy, trees, fluffy bunnies and rainbows?”
“I work really hard and I collect the Earned Income Tax Credit to pay for the eight children I have. All of their fathers refuse to pay child support. I am one...sniff...of the...boo hoo, tissue please...47%. Why do you, gulp, refuse to represent me as my president? Sob!”
“I am in my thirties and attending a graduate program at Georgetown. I am also a dumb slut and completely unaware that I can get birth control pills at Wal*Mart for $10. Whyyyyy won’t you pay for my birth control?”
I thought the second debate was on Foreign Policy and the third was the town hall. Guess I got them reversed. I’d rather have the Town Hall last ...
I thought the second debate was on Foreign Policy and the third was the town hall. Guess I got them reversed. I’d rather have the Town Hall last ...
Might better tune out for this one. The fix is in.
Better start blogging a.s.a.p. so the world knows about this beforehand.
Where does it say obamma is suing? Was the present title changed from earlier?
For once, an accurate headline LOL!
Oh, and...
“Moderator: Candy Crowley (CNN Chief Political Correspondent)”
CNN has about a multi-million dollar appeal languishing in Obama’s NLRB (NLRB Case 05-CA-031828) since 2009.
Not that Candy’s bosses would say anything to influence her.
participants will be undecided voters
These are the people whose free cell phone requests haven’t been appproved yet or whose status is pending.
The administration has hired more than 10,000 new government employees to speed up the approval process for the millions of requests./s
Can someone explain the title of this thread? It doesn’t match the title at the link, and I can’t figure out who is suing whom for what?
Somehow I ended up on a left wing mailing list of Move On. This is an email re how the left wing progressives feel about the debate:
Dear MoveOn member,
That was infuriating.
During last night’s presidential debate, Mitt Romney smirked his way through dozens of mischaracterizations, distortions, and outright lies. The moderator, Jim Lehrer, never cut him off. And now the mainstream media is saying that Mitt won the debate.
We can’t let Romney “win” the debate on a boatload of lies.
He lied about his tax plan, his deficit plan, and Medicare. He lied about what “Obamacare” would do. He lied, baldly and convincingly, about Obama’s entire presidency.1
We need to move quickly to set the record straight. Our online team worked overnight preparing a media blitz—including online ads targeted at swing-state voters—correcting the worst lies in an easy-to-share format.
Chip in $5 to get the truth out—countering Mitt’s lies.
If we don’t fight back now with the truth, some of those lies will stick, and Romney could pull ahead.
Already, Romney and his Super PAC friends have spent millions on blatantly false ads attacking President Obama for gutting work requirements for welfare and cutting $700 million from Medicare.
Last night was more of the same.
And research shows that when lies get repeated enough times people will believe them—no matter how outlandish they might seem. The only way to keep Romney honest is to make sure the facts get corrected on the spot.
We’re now in the moment when millions of undecided voters who don’t usually pay attention to politics start to focus.
This is it. This is what MoveOn’s massive online network is for. Let’s use it.
Please chip in $5.
Thanks for all you do.
–Angie, Mark, Lenore, Tate, and the rest of the team
1. “Presidential Debate Fact-Check and Updates,” The New York Times, October 3, 2012
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=281980&id=53824-21930683-_smjiTx&t=4
Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 7 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from
I would call anyone who is undecided at this point in the election Rip. They obviously have just awakened from a long sleep of the last 4 years!