Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/27/2012 9:03:11 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Signalman

Plus 12 and he is getting killed?


2 posted on 09/27/2012 9:04:59 AM PDT by scooby321 (AMS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Romney/Ryan are going to win. The enthusiasm among Repubs, coupled with the disappointment among Ind’s and Dems, is palpable.

I know several relatives and friends who voted for Obama and now virulently oppose him. I don’t know ANYONE who voted for McCain but has since changed his mind.

Using the 2008 party ID models, particularly after the 2010 “shellacking” and the tanking economy, is flat out absurd.


4 posted on 09/27/2012 9:12:32 AM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman
Thanks for posting. In searchable and infamous focus groups sessions of Independents, by people such as Frank Luntz, you can witness Independents who are seemingly incapable of making a decision. I think these people are loathe to attach themselves to any decision that pollsters present to them. While the +12% is likely indicative of where things are, I firmly believe that as the November day of reckoning draws near that you will see Independents and Undecideds break sharply for Romney & Ryan. I think Obama and Axelrod know this.
5 posted on 09/27/2012 9:21:03 AM PDT by Obadiah (The 2008 crisis is long over. The crisis now is Obama's non-recovery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

While I’m heartened by this, I suspect the Hispanic/AA turnout will exceed the election number for all the above except, 2008.


7 posted on 09/27/2012 9:30:42 AM PDT by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman
Frankly, the way Independents go is, I think, a better indicator than almost anything else. This is because Independents are the most representative slice of America. An "independent" can be anything - left, right, white, black, rich, poor, whatever. The term is just a catch-all to describe someone who isn't a D or an R. Ds and Rs tend to cluster around certain personality/demographic/economic types. Independents may include these as well, but balance it out with everything else.

If Romney's leading with the Is at +12, he's going to smash Obama.

9 posted on 09/27/2012 9:48:39 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (It's time to make Obama a minor footnote in the pages of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

And this is EXACTLY what the GOP-e look at as the entire picture. Thus, they determine that if the GOP is going to win an election, they must put everything into what appears to be a moderate candidate. The problem with that view is that it does not take into account the number of the base that either stays home or does not vote for their moderate candidate.

The analysis that NEEDs to be done in addition to the “independents”, is an analysis of the base and their enthusiasm to support the candidate.

The ONLY reason McCain received the number of votes that he did was because of Gov Palin on the ticket. But the GOP-e see her and conservatives as a liability not as the motivated base.


11 posted on 09/27/2012 11:17:24 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Signalman

Linear regression of your information shows that if Romney is +12 with Independents, he will win by 4%-10%.

With an energized GOP, and a loss of enthusiasm from students, I tend to think it’ll be closer to 10% than 4%.

Anything above 9% is landslide territory.


12 posted on 09/27/2012 11:30:13 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson