Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JustSayNoToNannies

“Significant” in this context means enough to have the effect you desire or any effect. Perot got 10% with no discernable effect on either party or even on a re-run.

So what is significant in this context for Virgil? Would 5% be significant? Do you think he will get 5%?


213 posted on 09/27/2012 12:10:17 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr
“Significant” in this context means enough to have the effect you desire or any effect. Perot got 10% with no discernable effect on either party or even on a re-run.

Already addressed: "Ross Perot was not a conservative, so that's an irrelevant example."

So what is significant in this context for Virgil?

Already answered: "I don't know the numerical value that will be significant in the current context - evidently substantially higher than what was achieved in 1992 or 2008."

215 posted on 09/27/2012 12:17:01 PM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson