[JustSayNoToNannies]

“Significant” in this context means enough to have the effect you desire or any effect. Perot got 10% with no discernable effect on either party or even on a re-run.

Already addressed: "Ross Perot was not a conservative, so that's an irrelevant example."

So what is significant in this context for Virgil?

Already answered: "I don't know the numerical value that will be significant in the current context - evidently substantially higher than what was achieved in 1992 or 2008."

[D-fendr]

I don't know the numerical value that will be significant in the current context

Not knowing the goal, not knowing if the goal is achievable, not taking into consideration the risks of the action if it fails...

These are not the indicators of a well thought-out mission or plan or a reasoned responsible basis for one's actions.

The stakes are way too high in this election.