You really think Virgil has the slightest chance to receive a significant percentage of the vote in 2008.
I don't know the numerical value that will be significant in the current context - evidently substantially higher than what was achieved in 1992 or 2008.
Does Goode have a chance to get that percentage, whatever it is? I don't know - but I do know that every single vote gets him closer.
A single electoral vote?
Highly unlikely.
“Significant” in this context means enough to have the effect you desire or any effect. Perot got 10% with no discernable effect on either party or even on a re-run.
So what is significant in this context for Virgil? Would 5% be significant? Do you think he will get 5%?
Sorry, should be:
Perot got 19% with no discernible future effect on either party or even on a re-run.