Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Compare the candidates: Obama, Romney, Goode (Vanity)
Image: Virgil Goode for President Committee | September 2012 | Koinonia

Posted on 09/26/2012 12:35:05 PM PDT by koinonia

http://www.goodeforpresident2012.com/the-issues.html

Folks, Obama and Romney are eating off the same menu (although Romney changes his diet from election to election).

Virgil Goode is the only acceptable candidate running, IMHO.



TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: elections; goode; goode2012; obama; romney; thirdparty; va2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-324 next last
To: GlockThe Vote; humblegunner
If my single vote was the difference between re-electing 0bama or not, I'd vote for Mittens. Since it's not, I think my vote is better used in setting the stage for 2016, 2020, ...

He just admitted he is voting for Obama.

No I didn't. Publik-skool gradooet, are you?

181 posted on 09/27/2012 7:23:49 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
I think my vote is better used in setting the stage for 2016

Yeah, that's what it'll do.

The more people cast an I'm-not-the-GOPe's-b!tch vote, the better that stage will be set.

Rainbow rapture in the retard room soon to follow.

Aren't you better than that? Wouldn't you like to at least try to be?

182 posted on 09/27/2012 7:26:18 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: UltraV
Lost votes are the only messages some people pay attention to.

No, voting for a third party means no one pays attention to you.

So FReepers should just take your word for that? Or would you perhaps like to offer some reason anyone should believe that?

183 posted on 09/27/2012 7:28:09 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
The more people cast an I'm-not-the-GOPe's-b!tch vote, the better that stage will be set.

If by setting the stage you mean allowing Obama to win, I guess you're right.

Personally, I'm not that fond of him. Your mileage may vary.

184 posted on 09/27/2012 7:30:32 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo, being wily, pities the fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine
I'm sorry, but distorting Romney into evil or =Obama only shows a desperation to justify a wrong position.

I think Jim Robinson had it right in calling Romney a "liberal progressive abortion/homosexual pushing Republican." Your mileage may vary.

You guys always bring that JimRob quote up, but conveniently forget the later one where he says, (and I’m paraphrasing), that to unseat Zero, there’s only one choice we really have.

I don't buy that paraphrase. And it doesn't contradict his earlier quote anyway.

185 posted on 09/27/2012 7:30:32 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

So you would prefer “sending a message” to defeating Obama.

Brilliant.


186 posted on 09/27/2012 7:40:54 AM PDT by humblegunner (Pablo, being wily, pities the fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
I think my vote is better used in setting the stage for 2016

Yeah, that's what it'll do.

The more people cast an I'm-not-the-GOPe's-b!tch vote, the better that stage will be set.

If by setting the stage you mean allowing Obama to win

Which part of "2016" did you not understand?

187 posted on 09/27/2012 7:40:54 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
So you would prefer “sending a message” to defeating Obama.

ADD? I already told you, "If my single vote was the difference between re-electing 0bama or not, I'd vote for Mittens. Since it's not, I think my vote is better used in setting the stage for 2016, 2020, ... "

188 posted on 09/27/2012 7:42:27 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies

What makes you think ther will be a 2016 if Zero gets back in, hmmm?

Your naivete’ is unbelievable.


189 posted on 09/27/2012 8:01:36 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("On the ascent of Olympus, what's a botched bar or two?" -Artur Schnabel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd
the position that a vote for Virgil Goode is stupid or a waste requires atheism

Nope. That position does not require atheism. On the contrary:

If there is a God who is eternal, then the consequences for following or not following standards set by that god are also eternal, unlike the consequences for basing a decision on temporal reasons.

A believer who sees that a vote for Virgil furthers the power of those adamantly use their power to who oppose God will not vote for Virgil.

And,since a vote for Virgil plainly furthers greater violations of the laws of God, those who believe it's Godly to vote for Virgil are exhibiting dumbness.

Better?

190 posted on 09/27/2012 8:06:04 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: JustSayNoToNannies
I think my vote is better used in setting the stage for 2016

About as much as McCain's defeat set the stage for 2012. As much as voting for Perot in 1992 set the stage for Dole's nomination and Clinton's re-election in1996…

191 posted on 09/27/2012 8:22:09 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine
What makes you think ther will be a 2016 if Zero gets back in, hmmm?

Define your terms; unless Zero causes a universal spacetime singularity ("Big Crunch") between now and then, there will be such a time as 2016.

Your naivete’ is unbelievable.

So enlighten me - isn't that what FR is for?

192 posted on 09/27/2012 8:40:42 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
I think my vote is better used in setting the stage for 2016

About as much as McCain's defeat set the stage for 2012. As much as voting for Perot in 1992 set the stage for Dole's nomination

Are you saying McLame and Herbie lost because not enough conservatives drank the GOPe Kool-Aid? I thought it was because they sucked.

193 posted on 09/27/2012 8:43:59 AM PDT by JustSayNoToNannies (A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

“If, on the other hand, your conservative vote is trapped by circumstances deep inside a state already lost to the Dark Side, like California, then you’re already getting a taste of what’s coming, and prepared or not, the outcome of the presidential portion of this election is probably not going to be decided by your vote. Goode Luck!”

I can go along with this reasoning if you are in a state like California, where there is ZERO chance to beat Obama. But even if you’re in a state like Pennsylvania or Michigan where there’s even a small chance that Romney may pull it out, I would NOT waste my vote this time around.

To your other point about Romney buying us some more time and giving us the satisfaction of ousting Obama, you may very well be right. That may be all we get out of a Romney win. But the way I see it, at least with Romney we still have a shot at saving the American dream. It may be a slim one, but America has overcome enormous challenges in the past, and we are a very resourceful and resilient people, so I wouldn’t count us out quite yet...


194 posted on 09/27/2012 9:05:59 AM PDT by lquist1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

Hey man, if you wanna be a Christian-hater, this isn’t a great site to do it. The same goes for making threats.

Sticks and stones bro.


195 posted on 09/27/2012 9:11:30 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

“I have no respect for a theocratic idiot who thinks America should be punished by God.

You’re now sounding like as much of a lunatic as your buddy here.”

Do you think a just God will sit idly by while we condone profane sexual acts and mass murder of millions of unborn babies?

I realize you hate the idea of God. Maybe the Daily Kos is a better fit for you.


196 posted on 09/27/2012 9:14:47 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: libdestroyer

Get off it, pal. If you bothered to read you’d know I’m Catholic.

The One TRUE Church.


197 posted on 09/27/2012 9:17:59 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine ("On the ascent of Olympus, what's a botched bar or two?" -Artur Schnabel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine; Jim Robinson

“Why? Is God speaking to you again?

people who used to hear voices in their heads were put in a rubber room in a straight-jacket where they belong.”

“What I’d really like to say to you two would get me banned and what I’d really like to do to you two would get me arrested.

Goodebot Trolls”

“I guess you’re another sanctimonious evangelical who thinks they’re always right because “God speaks directly to them””

You’re nothing but a bully behind a keyboard, Pal-patine. It’s amazing Jim tolerates you.


198 posted on 09/27/2012 9:19:32 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

“the future of America is in the balance and you trying to be funny isnt helpful. try it someplace else.”

Trying? NO sir. It just comes naturally.


199 posted on 09/27/2012 9:20:20 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: GlockThe Vote

“You are not destroying any libs by voting for obama.”

You think the libs will be too disappointed when pro-abortion, pro-gun-control, pro-tax-hiking, pro-universal healthcare Romney steps in?

Think again.


200 posted on 09/27/2012 9:22:39 AM PDT by libdestroyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson