[Radix]

After the 2010 vote, when not a single Republican won office (excluding Browns special election in January) I have become convinced that it was a fluke for our current Senator to have won.

My neighbors are simply too indoctrinated to the Ds.

Brown is going down.

54% vote in the Senate would be better than 0% which is what Warren will provide.

[lump in the melting pot]

Just donated $50 to Scott Brown’s re-election. Worth every penny to see a tear roll down a high cheekbone on election night.

[SamAdams76]

While I was discouraged by the 2010 mid-terms in Massachusetts, I don't see Brown losing this race. The aging Elizabeth Warren hippies have been holding signs on street corners but it is Brown signs that are popping up in yards all across the state.

Scott Brown resonates with working class voters here (mostly Democrat) while Warren leaves them cold. While hardly a conservative, like you say, it's better to have a senator who votes with us only half the time (Brown) then one that will vote with us zero percent of the time (Warren)

[genghis]

54??
heck brown is good for 75
but he most important one for majority leader
100
go brown
plus he drives libs absolutely crazy
go brown