Posted on 09/18/2012 8:34:55 PM PDT by rocco55
Mike Zullo, the lead investigator in Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation of Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, says he has returned from a second trip to Hawaii with additional evidence the state’s Department of Health is maintaining a cover-up of Obama’s 1961 birth records.
When Arpaio dispatched Zullo for the second trip, the assignment was kept confidential for Zullo’s safety and to prevent media links. Only Arpaio and the chief deputy of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office were aware of the assignment.
Zullo worked closely with local contacts, including Duncan Sunahara, the brother of Virginia Sunahara, an infant child born in Hawaii Aug. 4, 1961, the same day Obama was born, and died the next day.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Invertigator?
I think I know what you are trying to say, then again?
Well-written and clear article. My question to Zullo would be “Was Virginia’s number 011080 the last number assigned in 1961?” Or where does it appear in the 1961 series — in October? November?
But maybe that is just too obvious.
Very odd that the dead baby’s birth certificate lists her mother’s race as Korean and her father’s as Japanese. Those are nationalities, not races. They are both of the Mongoloid race.
The fact that the MSM and everyone involved in this farce is successful in hiding the truth about this Fraud, just more proof of how finished we really are.
Arpaio ping!
World Net Daily... ‘nuff said. LOL!
That’s all nonsense about how fragile the original BCs from 1961 would be. I’ve recently spent time reading old, bound newspapers from around 1917 to 1920 and they were in decent shape, and could be handled without damaging. And the BCs would have been printed on thicker and better paper, and would be only 8 1/2 x 11, unlike the much larger newspaper size paper.
50 years is not that old for paper documents.
I have a set of the complete works of Charles Dickens, printed in the year of his death (1864).
I agree, 50 years is young for documents.
The Court can either act, or encourage Congress to exercise its Article IV Section 1 powers to control the manner in which the records are shared. Note that Congress cannot prevent Arizona from its full faith and credit access to Hawaii's public records, it can only direct the manner in which those records may be proved.
Either way, via SCOTUS or Congress, the matter must be discussed. There are no questions of standing in this matter between the states, SCOTUS, and Congress when demanding Article IV Section 1 access to Hawaii's records.
-PJ
He went by the name Barry in his early life- so his BC probally says Barry something — Barry Davis, Barry Dunham, Barry Obama, Barry Soetoro, ect.. He used Barry in the indonisa school to college we know of— later in life he became Barrack Hussein Obama..
Yep, and I've also been going through some old family books and papers: World Book Encyclopedia from 1935, handwritten college papers form the 1930s, and other books from between the world wars. All were just kept in boxes or on shelves, and are in very good condition, a little yellowed and a little dried, but still can be handled and used without damage to the paper.
Those 1961 BCs would be in excellent condition and could be handled and copied with no harm at all. The Hawaiian AG is spinning some tall tales, to put it nicely.
Why is WND the only place you ever read about any of this?
Someone who turns things upside down.
Good question, but honestly, do you see any other news source racing to interview Arpaio’s crew ?
“When Arpaio dispatched Zullo for the second trip, the assignment was kept confidential for Zullo’s safety and to prevent media links.”
Why is Arpaio attempting to keep the Obama Birth Certificate story out of the media by preventing media websites to link the stories?
Paper docs shouldn’t even come into the discussion ! The Nordyke twins original birthcerts were printed of microfiche
which has a longer life expectancy than paper docs. If you’ve seen the proud Nordyke mother holding up these BCs, they were actually negative images. I assume someone had them reverse printed onto paper. Not sure, but I ‘think’ she acquired these in 1988 ?
I have searched low and high for any dictionary or lexicon that recognizes this interesting word and have yet to find it. If you could direct me to any information regarding this strange and unusual word I would appreciate it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.