Posted on 09/11/2012 8:26:06 AM PDT by Ben Barrack
Conspiracy theories about 9/11 are in abundance. Some even believe that it was an “inside job”. We reject this notion completely. However, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the Bush administration made a conscious and very ill-advised decision not to go after the real perpetrators of the attacks – Saudi Government officials, Princes, and wealthy financiers. The accounts of the deaths of three Saudi Princes in particular don’t just border on absurd; they cross the line into absurdity. Foul play is the only logical conclusion.
On the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, Americans should come to grips with the fact that those responsible for attacking us have not been brought to justice. Yes, Osama bin Laden is dead and the nineteen hijackers who rammed our own airliners into our own buildings in order to slaughter 3000 Americans are long gone but who provided al-Qaeda with the financing necessary to carry out these attacks and why were so many individuals and entities who were responsible, not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report at all?
Three Saudi Princes were outed by Abu Zubaydah thanks to Enhanced Interrogation Techniques (EIT); three hundred Saudis were permitted to fly out of the United States in the days after 9/11, many of whom were not questioned, including one of the three Princes; this means that U.S. authorities allowed at least one culpable Saudi Prince out of the country. Were there more?
The cold hard truth is that our government knew full well who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks and chose NOT to make them pay.
Unless, of course, you believe three Saudi Princes were solely responsible for the deaths of 3000 Americans.
http://www.shoebat.com/2012/09/11/911-bombshell-report-3000-americans-for-three-saudi-princes/
If Shoebat is a Saudi, he is under the aegis of a prince. That's the way the KSA brand of petro-feudalism works.
Trying to figure out which KSA prince did what .. or which one is a good guy and which a bad guy ... is a really good way to go nuts. The Saudi game is one with very high stakes. They have a "nationally (family) owned" limitless supply of a commodity that they produce and ship for $2/bbl that eventually sells for $100/bbl X millions of bbls every day. About 5% of that is more than enough to run the country on a very lavish scale. The rest is for mischief.
In KSA, one really can't even "Follow the Money," The House of Saud in some unfathomable way splits it up about 3 million ways and it changes every day. We don't get a vote. We don't have to like it. We do have to know that whatever follows this "goverment" is bound to be much worse for our national interest. A Westerner, or a Western Government can believe NOTHING these people say ... and that's the people from whatever is currently the top on any given day, to the bottom.
Say, here's an idea just off the top of my head. Since we've got plenty, why don't we just produce our own oil?
These people are nothing but nomad Bedouins, and should be dealt with like the trash they are.
No one would give a crap about them if it wasn’t what they were sitting on.
An escape from prison planet... sigh...
We have enough natural gas to meet 500 years of demand. So, where is the NG-Powered car? Where are the Diesel-powered passenger cars and light trucks (which alone could end our dependence upon foreign sources)? Every other automotive country in the world is switching to them. Not us. A Toyota Corolla with the Diesel motor available in Japan gets over 60 mpg!
Any fool with minimal what used to be HS science and math can see that Coal, Oil, Natural Gas, and Nuclear power will reign for the next 200 years ... not wind, solar, tide, and whatever a the mind of a lawyer who majored in "English" can conjure up.
Sure we should develop "Alternative Sources." In the meantime the fools whom some malignant gods have placed in charge with the votes of the stupid have no right to cripple our economy while they chase pseudo-scientific will'o'the-wisps.
I unequivocally reject Alex Jones and the 9/11 Truthers.
If you actually read it, you might get it.
Yes. Agree.
It is more expensive to produce more of our own oil than it is to import it. When the price goes up the Texas oil wells get put down. When the price goes down - it no longer makes economic sense to pump it up and they cap the well.
Here is an idea off the top of my head - let us buy up all the cheap oil they want to sell us for the next couple of decades and save ours until the supply starts to diminish or until the price goes up.
The number one problem the US has is energy!
At $4/gallon for gas, our consumer based economy is not going anywhere.
Romney should have put forth a simple plan to fix the price of oil at $50 per barrel, by selling future rights to our own oil. A slightly more complex plan would tie part of the revenue to reducing the debt.
IOW/ drill baby drill needs to be actualized into a common sense plan that can be pasted on a gas pump.
Will that $50 a bbl cover the costs of production?
I did.
“The cold hard truth is that our government knew full well who was responsible for the 9/11 attacks and chose NOT to make them pay.”
You aslo go down the very “jones esque” train of thought
“three hundred Saudis were permitted to fly out of the United States in the days after 9/11, many of whom were not questioned, including one of the three Princes; this means that U.S. authorities allowed at least one culpable Saudi Prince out of the country”
Supposition on your part and leading supposition at that.
“Clinton should be included in any discussion of blame for 9-11”
Let’s not forget the suppression of the evidence pointing to John Doe #2 for the OKC bombing.
It’s hard to blame the right wing when they are being handled by an Iraqi.
Oh and by the way, Romney has already said that royalty revenue from increasing oil production would help us reduce the deficit and eventually balance the budget.
Uh,
9/11 Commission staffers released a supplemental report one month after the Commission Report.
Allow me to quote from it:
The Lexington, Kentucky, Flight. On September 16, 2001, a chartered luxury Boeing 727 departed from Lexington, Kentucky, for England.
There were 14 individuals on board, the majority of whom were Saudi nationals, including Saudi Prince Ahmed Bin Salman Bin Abdulaziz and his son Prince Sultan Bin Fahad Bin Salman Abdulaziz; the latter had flown to Lexington from Tampa, Florida, on September 13, 2001.
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/aug/911-terr-trav.pdf
That prince was identified by Abu Zubaydah through waterboarding, as being complicit in 9/11. Four months later, that prince was dead.
I’ve believed, and continue to believe, that an unstated reason for invading Iraq was to take out the big regional threat to Saudi Arabia and this allow us to reposition our forces out of Saudi this allowing the House of Saud to go to work on it’s internal troublemakers. Something that could have incited a Civil War had it taken place while US forces were still there.
In support of this, I’d not how quickly and thoroughly the US una$$ed from Saudi after the defeat of Saddam and his regime.
I’d also point out how little we’ve heard about the Saudi “street” and potential civil war since we’ve left. There was an article five or six years ago about how the House of Saud had broken it’s covenant with the Wahibbist clergy and were going after them with a (quiet) vengeance. But I haven’t been able to find it in a while.
Prince Ahmed Bin Salman Bin Abdulaziz
died of Heart Failure at age 43 july 2002
Having been a major investor in American Horse Raceing and living in the USA a good deal of the time.
That the blog is restating claims by the rather dubious Gerald Posner - JFK and 911 conspiracy author and former writer for the daily beast before being fired for plagiarism does not bolster your case.
I believe I quoted from a 9/11 Commission Staff Report.
Prince Ahmed Bin Salman Bin Abdulaziz
died of Heart Failure at age 43 july 2002
Having been a major investor in American Horse Raceing and living in the USA a good deal of the time.
That the blog is restating claims by the rather dubious Gerald Posner - JFK and 911 conspiracy author and former writer for the daily beast before being fired for plagiarism does not bolster your case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.