[Beave Meister]

Next it's going to be okay to have sex with your animals as long as you love each other.

[hawaiianninja]

Wow. O_o

[Ransomed]

“I’m not saying this is an absolute but in a way, if you’re not having kids – who gives a damn?”

I can’t believe he is so intolerant of people in love based on whether they choose to breed or not. What a bigot.

Freegards

[ExCTCitizen]

The movie does not yet have a distributor in the states.

I have the perfect distributor -- WASTE MANAGEMENT!! LOL

[the anti-liberal]

Jaime and Cersei Lannister (Game of Thrones)!

[muir_redwoods]

I’ve always love Golden Retrievers

For that matter I’ve always loved dark chocolate

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Listees, I'm pinging out this article as well just in case anyone wants to comment on this thread. In my view, anyone who condemns those who find this promotion of incest evil, is a feral subhuman.

[familyop]

[1035rep]

yuck!

[a fool in paradise]

Knew it wouldn’t be long before Roman Polanski was back in the news...

[a fool in paradise]

People think it is hyperbole or insulting when I say that the goal of the sex positive agenda (which uses the homosexual agenda as a battering ram to society’s laws and mores) is to end ALL moral judgments over ALL sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of parter(s). And our tax dollars fund this agenda, whether it is through SIECUS, public universities, or publicly funded hospitals and the like.

[Pinkbell]

“I’m not saying this is an absolute but in a way, if you’re not having kids – who gives a damn? Love who you want. Isn’t that what we say? Gay marriage – love who you want?” Cassavetes told The Wrap

Cassavetes, while I'm sure sincere in his support, has only helped conservatives with the point that redefining marriage for homosexuals opens the door for redefining it for other groups.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"I'm not saying this is an absolute but in a way, if you’re not having kids – who gives a damn?"

In a way --- he's right. But maybe not in the way he thinks.

He's 'right' because as soon as you split procreation away from sex, you've shriveled its meaning. It's disabled. It's shrunken. It's small.

The commitment of sexual intimacy itself, still intact, still procreative, is sacred. It means:

"I'm no longer mine but yours. You're no longer yours, but mine. We belong to the children who may come, and to the 10,000 generations before us and after us, and to God with whose creative powers we now cooperate. His are the times and ages: To Him be glory and dominion, through all ages of eternity. Amen."

You didn't think of it that way? Maybe, like most of us, it took you awhile. But that's what it is.

Split off the procreative significance, and what's left? Insignificance.

"I'm, uh, in love. I guess. Or I was."

"Whatever."

"Meh."

Or in Nick Cassavetes' words, "Who gives a damn?"