Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djone

The question is backwards. Because the South WOULD be better off without the North. . . .


6 posted on 08/25/2012 10:24:40 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border. I **DARE** you to cross it. . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Salgak
Yes you are right the South would be better off without the North. Crap if Texas left the North/country would lose one fifth of its economy. Take Louisiana with and the the North would be in major energy crunch. By all rights Alaska and the entire northwestern states would come to sans Washington and Oregon.
10 posted on 08/25/2012 10:48:56 PM PDT by WilliamRobert (Texas' newest senator Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson