Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

the EPA’s Utility MACT rule, which could force companies to install expensive technological upgrades to eliminate various pollutants from coal-fired power plants. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has branded the rule as one of the most costly regulations ever imposed on power plants, ....leading to fewer jobs and a boost in consumer energy prices. “The President’s EPA has clearly declared a war on coal — an industry crucial to our economy and Sen. Casey has done nothing to support the energy industry and the Pennsylvania jobs it creates,” Smith
1 posted on 08/17/2012 5:51:03 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: stocksthatgoup

Sheesh! I have a meeting with the epa next Tuesday. I’ll handle it, and they’ll be generally satisfied, but,,,,, they always add some unimportant negatives to their reports. Why? Because they have to seem revalunt, series, hugh, etc.. PITA!


2 posted on 08/17/2012 6:06:49 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup

Coal plants need to be converted to gas. If you live in an area that has one you will understand why. Dirty trash and fly ash comes out of their smokestacks and pollutes everything. A worker there told me he has to decontaminate his car every week that is parked there because of fly ash. There is one about 25 miles east (fortunately) of me that is near a golf course. They need fixed or phased out.


3 posted on 08/17/2012 6:07:48 PM PDT by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup
There has been 9 Gigawatts of coal power production shuddered in 2012 and another 12 GW to be shuddered by 2015. We are not even beginning to replace the power production. The only reason we are not seeing too much trouble yet is because the economy is in such a hole. Yes that GIGA watts and it's a lot.
6 posted on 08/17/2012 6:17:00 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup

Getting the coal plants a-smokin’ and the coal trains a-rollin’ a’gin should be one of the top priorities of a new Romney adminstration.

Coal is America’s future, not it’s “past”. Actually, if the left had its way (as they are getting now), ALL forms of fossil-fuel energy would be in America’s “past” — and many of us would be in the dark.


12 posted on 08/17/2012 7:25:22 PM PDT by Road Glide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: stocksthatgoup

Obama is another President that doesn’t want the U.S.A. to use the coal we have. That being said, he is a PIKER compared to what the Clinton Administration did in regards to coal.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1639944/posts


17 posted on 08/18/2012 1:41:49 PM PDT by Pagey (B. Hussein Obama is weak, and is a worse human being than F.D.R., on multiple levels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson