Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ArrogantBustard

Liberals define poverty in relative terms, comparing yourself to your peers. This is why the poverty of socialism doesn’t bother them because all your peers are equally poor.

I encountered this when talking about the coming financial collapse with a libinlaw. Her solace was in the fact that we’d “all be in the same boat”.

As if it were a GOOD thing.


17 posted on 08/10/2012 8:12:21 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working fors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: MrB
Liberals define poverty in relative terms, comparing yourself to your peers.

Fascinating.

They see wealth or poverty as being better or worse off than somebody else, rather than being well enough off to enjoy whatever necessities or luxuries one desires. The admit being motivated by pure Envy and Pride. Last time I checked, those were among the "Seven Deadly Sins".

29 posted on 08/10/2012 8:42:13 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: MrB

The lib’s are seething with envy for sure. My lib brother once told me that he wouldn’t mind giving up a good portion of his own wealth, as long as most of the wealth of the rich guy living up the street was confiscated.


37 posted on 08/10/2012 10:40:34 AM PDT by ladyrustic (Get in the face of a liberal in honor of Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson