Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Not defending the horrible actions of Jerry Sandusky, but Penn State may win this in court. Mark Emmert of the NCAA is not Roger Goodell. This is not the NFL. $60 million fine? Can you spell anti-trust?
1 posted on 08/06/2012 3:50:40 PM PDT by safetysign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: safetysign

It would be ironic if the NCAA responds by saying “Forget the $60 million . . . you can have the ‘death penalty’ instead.”


2 posted on 08/06/2012 3:57:13 PM PDT by Charlemagne on the Fox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: safetysign
"...Penn State may win this in court..."

Based on what?

3 posted on 08/06/2012 3:57:36 PM PDT by cweese (Hook 'em Horns!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: safetysign

Ryan McCombie’s (retired Navy Seal and newly elected B.O.T. member) letter to the Board of Trustees:

06 August 2012

Dear fellow board members

The challenges we have dealt with over the past year have been the most difficult and demanding that any Board of a Public University has ever faced. The issues are incredibly painful and highly contentious and the path that we should follow is anything but clear. Nonetheless, it is our mission to determine what happened without favor or bias toward the responsible parties, just as it is our duty as trustees to act in the best interests of Penn State. I do not believe the recent actions of the Administration and the NCAA have been consistent with that mission, and I cannot but feel that our inaction is a failure in our duty. I believe we owe to all involved – especially our University community – to insist on and require full due process before we accept these penalties.

Due process is not a theoretical concept to me. It is one of the core values that I fought for as a Navy Seal and as a 26-year veteran of the US Navy. I spent much of my adult life in 3rd world countries ruled by tyrannical dictators. Little did I know upon retiring from this exciting yet stressful vocation to bucolic Central PA, that I would become embroiled in a comparable experience here.

I respect Louis Freeh and I appreciate the work he and his staff did to investigate the handling of the Sandusky matter. At the same time, I think it is important to recognize that the Freeh report is not the equivalent of a legal hearing or review. No one testified under oath; multiple key witnesses were not interviewed; accused parties were not given a fair chance to respond; the findings were highly subjective; and several individuals are still waiting to have their day in court. Yet despite these very serious limitations and others, our Board allowed the Freeh report to be presented as a full and fair review, which it most certainly is not; and we stood by passively while the University accepted an unprecedented penalty from the NCAA, based entirely on the findings of the Freeh report. These are grave mistakes that inflict undue harm on the entire Penn State community, in addition to compromising the rights of numerous individuals.

The argument that is given on all of these issues is that we must do whatever we can to serve the victims and act in a way that eliminates the chance that something like this can ever happen again. I support that end and understand the sentiment behind it, but also know that we owe it to our University and the constituencies we represent to demand due process in this matter. Our desire for speed and decisiveness cannot and must not justify actions that clearly and decisively compromise the future of this institution, unfairly tarnish its reputation and violate the rights of accused individuals. If in the rush to put this crisis behind us, we act in a way that limits the discovery of the full truth or unfairly blames certain individuals, while exempting others who rightfully deserve blame, we will have completely failed on the most important task this Board will ever have.

It is for these reasons that I have decided to file an appeal today with the NCAA seeking a full due process hearing. Additionally, I will be, along with others, seeking to determine whether President Erickson had the authority to enter into the consent decree absent Board approval. It is my belief that this matter did require board approval and that we should engage in a full, and complete, review. In the end, we all benefit from having this matter handled correctly and with full regard for due process – only then can we be truly confident in the result and the actions we take as a board. Furthermore, only after we have given all involved the opportunity to be heard can we move forward together as one University.

It is my sincere hope that some or all of you will join me on this path. If you wish to join in my appeal, please contact my attorney, Paul Kelly, at (617) 305-1263, or by email paul.kelly@jacksonlewis.com.

Let me also be clear: I do not do this seeking a predetermined result nor do I claim to know what the final answers will be. If there is blame to be borne by any or all of our officials, a due process hearing will not hide that fact and I will accept it – as will the tens of thousands of Penn Staters out there not assuaged by a limited process.

I know my actions will be poorly received by some on this board and in the community at large. To that end it would be easier to remain silent and allow these unfair actions to remain unchallenged. I cannot do this. As long as I am a member of this board, I will fight to learn the full truth of the Sandusky scandal and then, and only then, endorse the assignment of blame and the imposition of sanctions.

For the Glory,

Ryan J. McCombie


5 posted on 08/06/2012 4:01:22 PM PDT by FlJoePa ("Success without honor is an unseasoned dish; it will satisfy your hunger, but it won't taste good")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: safetysign

Like Rush said today, they took Louis Freeh’s report and ran with it. They just wanted to get this behind them.


6 posted on 08/06/2012 4:06:45 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the collectivists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: safetysign

(Not defending the horrible actions of Jerry Sandusky, but Penn State may win this in court. )

The NCAA has already stated NO APPEALS...
Don’t know if the trustee would have standing to sue in court but would not matter the NCAA never loses........


10 posted on 08/06/2012 4:20:21 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: safetysign
Not defending the horrible actions of Jerry Sandusky, but Penn State may win this in court. Mark Emmert of the NCAA is not Roger Goodell.

Didn't you hear that Goodell and the NFL have offered to cut Vilma's suspension in half if he agrees to drop his defamation lawsuit. I don't think the NFL and Goodell are in as good a position as they once thought. The NFL and Goodell will lose if the case goes to trial.

As for the NCAA, it has a lousy record with lawsuits. Tarkanian won huge, as did Rick Neuheisel.

The PSU trustees will win because while the sexual abuse cover-ups were criminal, there was no competitive advantage gained and I have serious doubts that the NCAA has jurisdiction over the matter.

16 posted on 08/06/2012 4:38:36 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: South Hawthorne; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ..

PA Ping!

If you want on/off the PA Ping List, please freepmail me. Thanks!


17 posted on 08/06/2012 4:38:49 PM PDT by randita (Either the politicians fix our fiscal insanity, or the markets will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: safetysign

Can you spell EXTORTION?! “Give us what we want or we’ll give you the death penalty!
All they were after was the money. But once they hit PSU up for the money, they HAD TO throw in the robbery of the 111 wins (for their ol’ buddy Bobby Bowden) just to make it look like they gave a crap about anything else.
Bowden and the NCAA’s racism was clearly displayed, when the announcement that Bowden now has the most Ws included the QUALIFIER that he had the most Ws of all MAJOR universities, thereby screwing Eddie Robinson and Grambling U. out of the rightful title.

To quote Big Daddy Pollett in CAT ON A HOT TIN ROOF, “I smell the powerful odor of mendacity!”


27 posted on 08/06/2012 5:19:36 PM PDT by Tucker39 ( Psa 68:19Blessed be the Lord, who daily loadeth us with benefits; even the God of our salvation.KJV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson