Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

San Francisco Hypocrite Alert: Yosemite's lost valley will be subject of vote
Associated Press ^ | Aug. 5, 2012 | TRACIE CONE and JASON DEAREN

Posted on 08/05/2012 12:11:27 PM PDT by jwsea55

YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK, Calif. (AP) — This fall San Franciscans will vote on a local measure with national implications: It could return to the American people a flooded gorge described as the twin of breathtaking Yosemite Valley.

Voters will decide whether they want a plan for draining the 117-billion-gallon Hetch Hetchy reservoir in Yosemite National Park, exposing for the first time in 80 years a glacially carved, granite-ringed valley of towering waterfalls 17 miles north of its more famous geologic sibling.

The November ballot measure asks: Should city officials devise a modern water plan that incorporates recycling and study expansion of other storage reservoirs to make up the loss?

The measure could eventually undo a controversial century-old decision by Congress that created the only reservoir in a national park and slaked the thirst of a city 190 miles away.

The battle over Hetch Hetchy, first waged unsuccessfully by naturalist John Muir, had turned the Sierra Club from an outdoors group into an environmental powerhouse. The fight gained momentum in recent years when unlikely allies joined forces.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted2.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: california; feinstein; hetchhetchy; johnmuir; pelosi; sanfrancisco; sierraclub; yosemite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Lakeshark
greenies teamed up with a few fisherman

I'm not sure I would call trout unlimited "Fishermen". Besides, there is hardly anywhere in the state that isn't within an hour's drive for decent trout fishing.

I've even heard chatter about removing the Tippi dam.
41 posted on 08/05/2012 1:37:43 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
This one was a hydro power dam put up in the 1920’s, it could have been easily restored to be an actual generator of power, but the greenies teamed up with a few fisherman to tear it down. They want to tear down every dam in America, to bring us closer to a pristine state.

The enviros are also after most of the Bonneville dams, too. BPA provides huge, cheap Western US generating capacity. Sweetheart deals with various locals and, of course, the aluminum industry and Boeing. The Northwest power rates are cheap compared to CA's.

If BPA becomes castrated, bring back Dandy Don Merideth to sing "turn off the lights..."

42 posted on 08/05/2012 1:40:01 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55

At the same time this $14 billion water project to drain the Sacramento Delta sending more water southward is in the works:

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/jul/25/california-embarks-on-massive-water-project/


43 posted on 08/05/2012 1:44:24 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Yep, the Boardman. I heard a guy talk about it a few years ago, how he had shown everyone involved how they could use the dam to generate power with the existing components (he was an electrical engineer), and how the greenies just ran him over.

Having lived by Ann Arbor once upon a time, I'm floored they are doing this. Has it finally happened?


44 posted on 08/05/2012 1:45:28 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"a few fisherman" = *damning with faint praise*

Too much great fishing up here to take that group seriously, I doubt more than "a few" would ever fish there, it just gave the greenies some cover.

45 posted on 08/05/2012 1:49:20 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: livius; jwsea55
It will cut off all of the water supply of San Francisco and Peninsula cities,

Not quite. In the late 80s I lived above Los Altos Hills, right on the San Andreas fault, and commuted to SF via a drive to a Caltrain station in Palo Alto, took train to SF and walked to workplace. On the drive to and from home to Caltrain station I passed Crystal Springs reservoir, fed by water from Hetch Hetchy as well as local watershed.

Loss of water from Hetch Hetchy would represent a large but not total loss for the peninsula. As well, SF could bring in some water from Marin County, where I've lived as well.

Loss of Hetch Hetchy water would be a big loss, but not the total disaster as represented in this article.
46 posted on 08/05/2012 1:52:46 PM PDT by caveat emptor (Zippity Do Dah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I used to live a bit south of there in Evart. Just about anywhere there was water, there were trout. In fact I used to catch trout at the Hershey dam (which is now gone to return trout to the river)


47 posted on 08/05/2012 1:54:24 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
LOL.

They probably think they've made the water wetter too........

48 posted on 08/05/2012 2:01:59 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55

When they undam the valley, the years and years of silt buildup will go down stream and destroy all the fish all the way to the sea.

But hey, California has Billions of dollars in the bank to go replace perfectly good power and water systems for the fun of it right?


49 posted on 08/05/2012 2:03:02 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
At the same time this $14 billion water project to drain the Sacramento Delta sending more water southward is in the works:

That's the problem with these states so flush with money they don't know what to do with it. At least it is not like the state of Kalifornia that is heading towards bankruptcy...with a pension system $1 trillion underfunded.

Out of 36 million people, twentyfive percent of Kalifornia's budget is paid for by 144,000 residents. Another way of looking at that number is 144,000 residents pay 50% of the state's income taxes.
Over 20 years, from 1984 to 2004, Kalifornia's poplulation increased by 10 million people (from 24 to 36 million). During that period, only 100,000, or so, were added to the tax roles.

50 posted on 08/05/2012 2:10:12 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55
San Francisco Hypocrite Alert: Yosemite's lost valley will be subject of vote

The most common things in the universe are ignorance and stupidity. San Francisco leads on both counts. Perversion-addled brains may contribute to the problem.

San Francisco County has a watershed (in terms of ueful water supply for humans) of exactly zero.

I lived the first third of my life in SF.
I will probably live the final third of my life in the California Central Valley, which is on its way to becoming a dust bowl, thanks to the actions and inaction of the arrogant Dianne Feinstein.

Perhaps a similar fate would be a good irony for Sodom-by-the-Bay.

51 posted on 08/05/2012 2:13:18 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caveat emptor
Thanks for the info on the Marin supply.

They would still need to get across the bay. What about the other municipalities that are sold Hetch's water?

52 posted on 08/05/2012 2:18:34 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55
That's the coming surprise, they won't be getting the water.
There's always "reclaimed" water.

Wouldn't that be hilarious? They could get all their future drinking water from their George Dubya Bush Memorial Sewage Treatment Plant.

A more delicious irony is hard to imagine.

53 posted on 08/05/2012 2:22:17 PM PDT by publius911 (Formerly Publius 6961, formerly jennsdad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
Our great lakes czar "Cameron Davis" used to be the president of the alliance for the great lakes. Their primary goals are removing all the dams, creating buffer zones, Stopping drilling for everything from water to gas, and preventing houses from being built near water.

Alliance for the great lakes
54 posted on 08/05/2012 2:27:12 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: publius911
That's the coming surprise, they won't be getting the water. There's always "reclaimed" water.

Wouldn't that be hilarious? They could get all their future drinking water from their George Dubya Bush Memorial Sewage Treatment Plant.

A more delicious irony is hard to imagine.

The only thing that may be funnier is all those from Hollywierd out on Malibu's Colony sea shore. The leach lines for their "septic" tanks is the ocean in front of them. I wonder where they swim?

55 posted on 08/05/2012 2:32:16 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: caveat emptor

I think that S.F. gets all of its electrical power from generators whose turbines are powered exclusively by Hetch Hetchy water.


56 posted on 08/05/2012 2:47:31 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: old school; caveat emptor
I think that S.F. gets all of its electrical power from generators whose turbines are powered exclusively by Hetch Hetchy water.

That is what the article said. In reality, the power travels down transmission lines is generally sold to the nearest buyer to avoid transmission power losses and transmission costs. Agencies and power companies, essentially, swap production to avoid these costs.

57 posted on 08/05/2012 2:54:41 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: jwsea55

What happens when you’ve got nuthin’ to swap?


58 posted on 08/05/2012 3:08:58 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: old school
What happens when you’ve got nuthin’ to swap?

Ohhh, so observant! You got problems. Remember 10 years ago when Kalifornia had all those issues with expensive power? What ever is committed to has to be provided. In Kali's/SF's case, it is usually very expensive to replace peak power needs. SCE's residential rates are 30 cents a KW for not much power usage.

59 posted on 08/05/2012 3:18:20 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: old school
Cheap generation costs are considered 5 cents KW, or so. Hydrogeneration has almost zero costs since the fuel (water) is free.

This is why so many people who look at the long term, cleanest and cheapest solution for the Country's future electricy production needs to focus on nuclear.

Assuming the Japanese, Russians, French or the guys from 3 Mile Island don't operate a facility, nuke facilities are extremely safe.

60 posted on 08/05/2012 3:28:27 PM PDT by jwsea55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson