Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/02/2012 11:36:54 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If they could, Apple would patent/copyright the steering wheel as a proprietary interface.

A pox on them.


2 posted on 08/02/2012 11:39:49 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Now for some detail on various aspects....from Groklaw:

*********************************************EXCERPT**************************************

Food Fight in Apple v. Samsung ~pj - Updated

Wednesday, August 01 2012 @ 10:14 PM EDT


Being a lawyer requires a mix of skills, part chess master, part negotiator, part brainiac, part wordsmith, and part street theater artist. Today in the Apple v. Samsung trial, there was a bit of the last. Samsung made a bold move. It could have real consequences. Here's the very best coverage, at Above the Law:
Man, I really wish I could sit in the gallery at the Apple v. Samsung trial over the next few weeks. It’s a war zone down in San Jose. In court yesterday, Judge Lucy Koh became “livid” when she found out about a Samsung statement describing evidence that had been ruled inadmissible by the court. She demanded to know John Quinn’s involvement in the statement (Quinn Emanuel represents Samsung), and then she threatened to sanction him. Whoa.

Quinn was ordered to explain himself, and we’ve got the declaration he filed this morning. It’s a doozy, and predictably, the master litigator does not take kindly to, in his words, “media reports… falsely impugning me personally”…

In brief, Samsung released to the media some materials that the judge ruled were offered too late to show to the jury. The judge asked for an explanation, which John Quinn of Quinn Emanuel manfully provided. Here's his Declaration [PDF]. We haven't heard from her yet, but Apple sees an opportunity. In fact, Apple now says it will be asking the court to sanction Samsung, according to a letter [PDF] Apple filed with the court today.

In a small way, everything that is wrong with the way Apple has been handling this case is encapsulated in this micro-drama. And I think this is what it means: Samsung is sick of Apple FUD in the media, and it intends to fight back in the court of public opinion.


3 posted on 08/02/2012 11:40:41 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The Global Warming Hoax was a Criminal Act....where is Al Gore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Apple is such a crooked company.

They’ve learned well from their Left-wing friends on how to use the court system to pretend to be the eternal victim of the free market, and get crooked judges to shut down anyone that threatens their cash-flow.


7 posted on 08/02/2012 12:51:32 PM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson