Since you asked - I’ll explain...
Only a liberal argues for the legalization of drugs. Only a liberal confuses alcohol Prohibition with the sensible drug laws we have on the books today. Only a liberal can hyper-inflate dog shootings and no-knock raids into a solid reason to waive the white flag in the WOD and allow Mexican cartels to become legitimate business owners here in the US. Only a liberal could agree with Braney Frank and Ron Paul that dope should be legal. Only a liberal can hide behind the Constitutional and claim drugs are OK and should be legal
Not even the liberal nuts and fruits in California - when they had the chance - would vote in legal marijuana.
I could go on and on... but as we know... Liberalism is a mental disorder. And no amount of facts and logic will change pro-dopers minds.
Yeah, but only a moron confuses "ending the Drug War" with "legalisation of drugs."
And I take it that “real conservative” have no problem with big, overbearing government so long as those jack-boots are enforcing your world view on others. “Real conservatives” like to see those boots on the throats of people who dare to disagree with them, it that it?
I have a different name for folks like that. They are authoritarians. And they are dangerous people. Because in the end, they are no different than Mao, or Stalin or any other tin pot who believed in imposing their will on people who disagreed with their world view.
Who here in this thread has argued for the legalization of drugs?
Why are you inventing arguments for other posters instead of addressing the actual opinions brought forth?