Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwardian street style: Astonishing amateur images which capture the fashion of women
UK Daily Mail ^ | July 16, 2012 | Staff

Posted on 07/16/2012 5:44:05 AM PDT by C19fan

Street blogging may be considered to be a modern phenomenon, but a series of images unearthed by Kensington and Chelsea Libraries prove that the practice may date as far back as the early 1900’s. The Library service has published several wonderful images by the late amateur photographer Edward Linley Sambourne, who was also the chief cartoonist for Punch, which give an amazing insight into the street style of the woman of London and Paris over a century ago. Sambourne’s beautiful street photography captures the casual side of Edwardian fashion in a manner which is rarely seen.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: edwardian; fashion; photojournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
The clothes are gorgeous and this is just the clothes women wore to just go about town in. What a treat it would be to walk around London during this time and appreciate the pretty ladies in their finery. Probably the men would take notice that it became socially acceptable for women to show their ankles, va va voom hee hee. Before that time ankle showing was a sign you were a fallen women.
1 posted on 07/16/2012 5:44:13 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I see that some of them were captured walking while reading a book....not too far off from today with people walking and using their smart phones.

I watched an old ‘reality’ program from the UK (1999) over the weekend “The 1900 House”...one of the big problems back then were the restrictive, body altering corsets.


2 posted on 07/16/2012 5:49:17 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Check my profile page for the FReeper Online Cookbook 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Very nice.

I do find it a little odd that some of the outfits are described as "black". How can one tell?

3 posted on 07/16/2012 5:49:22 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Roger Taney? Not a bad Chief Justice. John Roberts? A really awful Chief Justice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

We all look like slobs today. They’d be horrified at us a century hence.


4 posted on 07/16/2012 5:51:11 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libertarian27

You make a good point but the outcome was so pretty and it forced a woman to have a nice posture while walking. I think Princess Kate wore some sort of corset for her wedding. Is it any different from today’s women who put themselves under the knife to alter their bodies?


5 posted on 07/16/2012 5:52:34 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

FREE REPUBLIC.
MAKING LIBERALS DAFFY SINCE 1997.




Click the Pic
Donate today


Support Free Republic

6 posted on 07/16/2012 5:58:07 AM PDT by deoetdoctrinae (Gun free zones are playgrounds for felons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I’m also reminded that those pictures were taken before the invention of the bra.

Also, maybe it was just the photographer’s taste, but I didn’t see any women that could remotely be called “fat”.


7 posted on 07/16/2012 5:58:07 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

All I can think is how hot wearing all the fluff would be. Sewing it all and ironing it would be a nightmare.


8 posted on 07/16/2012 6:02:45 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
What, our women are classy today:
9 posted on 07/16/2012 6:06:54 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I don’t understand the waistline and the baggy shirt front. The waistline goes down in front and up in back. The shirts look very unflattering to me. I usually like period clothes but am confused by those two elements. I love the shoes. The hats are sort of disturbing too.


10 posted on 07/16/2012 6:14:01 AM PDT by Mercat (Necessity is the argument of tyrants. John Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This is one of my favorite periods in women’s fashion. So pretty. I love the photos of the ladies walking along reading their little books. It almost looks like they are texting.


11 posted on 07/16/2012 6:14:01 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

cool

Some of the hats are a little over the top, but I guess it was a way for women to express their individuality.


12 posted on 07/16/2012 6:14:30 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I lived in Spain for six years. The streets were always littered with trash. I notice in these photos - NO litter on the sidewalks or the streets.


13 posted on 07/16/2012 6:15:32 AM PDT by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Obviously it was totally unacceptable to trash the street and one might add there would of been a small army of street sweepers keeping London as tidy as possible. Also, this would of been in the more fashionable parts of London out in Westminster and the West End. I would imagine the East End would of been much dirtier. Although if the ladies crossed they have to navigate the horse dung.


14 posted on 07/16/2012 6:18:54 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I think the one thing I hate most of all is seeing women today cover themselves in tattooes, and Miley is one of ‘em.


15 posted on 07/16/2012 6:20:07 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (If you like lying Socialist dirtbags, you'll love Slick Willard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
And no fatsos.

Were eating habits more refined?

16 posted on 07/16/2012 6:21:04 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Were eating habits more refined?

No, they just ate a little less and exercised more.

17 posted on 07/16/2012 6:23:40 AM PDT by Paradox (I want Obama defeated. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
One of Sambourne's cartoons:

This was Punch's annual "New Year" cartoon - lots of commentary on issues of the day.

The owl on top of the heap is Gladstone:


18 posted on 07/16/2012 6:25:45 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGS Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

How beautiful and classy. I shudder to think of laundry day, though. Washing and ironing those clothes would be a nightmare.


19 posted on 07/16/2012 6:26:22 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
Ha!

No argument there!

Now days, girls compete to see who can look most like a
sl%$.

What I don't get is the ‘dirt’ part of the look. I mean, I was a hippy too, in college... BUT my clothes were clean and ironed. I also made some attempt to look feminine.

NOW, somehow girls achieve the ‘dirty’ look intentionally...dirty clothes, wrinkled clothes, pants dragging on the ground... torn and DIRTY. Especially, the hair style that looks like you dumped a bottle of Mazola on your head and then pulled your hair up into a messy blob.

I am sure tired of looking at dirty hair.... even if it is clean and made to look matted and dirty!

I am ashamed of being a woman when I see such sloppy and dirty girls who have NO regard for themselves. I guess the homely girls live this ‘style’ because now everyone looks like THEM!

20 posted on 07/16/2012 6:28:56 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson