Posted on 07/02/2012 12:49:15 PM PDT by trailhkr1
Has this photo been 'shopped?? Look at the faces in the back row....especially the women in the middle and to the right...or are the Romney boys going after women with some serious cheekage and eyebrows? Appears they placed Mitt's eyes and forehead on the other family members. Or am I just imagining things?
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
The short answer is "yes".
Really strange photo with really bad photoshopping. That’s a bunch of ugly mannequins.
Ok, that's sounds more reasonable. The family members in the photo just looked so bad I thought the Daily Mail would correct it.
???Romney doesn’t have any daughters only daughters-in-law.
Pop Quiz:
See if you can determine which Romney men have served in the armed forces by viewing this picture.
All the faces look distorted. Maybe it’s just a bad scan.
Trick question?
Yeah, it’s been ‘photoshopped’. Or, at least had an unsharp mask applied to clean up the details in the resampled image.
if the media had photoshopped this all of their magic underwear would be showing
So.. based upon this photo:
How many of Romney’s wives own a butter churn?
How many of the little girls will be married by age 14?
How many of them will be married to Romney AND own a butter churn?
Extra points for answering with a reference to an Osmond’s tune.
That looks like a low-res version of the picture that is badly pixellated.
..looks like they are wearing those short Halloween type mask...or is this just my crappy monitor?
Nope, not your monitor. it’s a REALLY bad photoshop job. Whoever did it, for whatever reason, should be fired for lack of talent.
They look like they’re all about to be sick.
If you have a picture of them all throwing up 10 minutes later, that would be awesome.
Which "USA Today" manipulated from this:
To make SOS Rice look demonic?
Leftists are evil, pure and simple.
Going after Romney's family like this is evil.
Who on the Romney team thought it would be a good idea to take a family photo wardrobe cue from Mike Huckabee?
I think it’s the results of compressing an original.
Consider:
1. The original was probably a huge file - high res camera, and large picture
2. The one posted above (the slightly BETTER one) is about 500kb
3. The original sample posted that looks really doctored is about 125kb.
Compare that to: I just dragged a simple photo of me taken by a high res camera: over 370 Megabytes, or 370,000 Kilobytes.
Probably that photo of the Romney’s (the original-original taken at the house was shrunk (fewer colors, fewer pixels) by a factor of about 3,200 ... in other words, 3,000 times less information in terms of color and/or pixels. Probably why it looks like Barry was playing with crayons again. (and would explain why the eyes on the men and women look black and are morphed with their eyebrows.
The left in this case is acquitted on charges of photoshopping Romney, but is still on the hook for conjuring Obama’s entire life.
"They must have gotten the Blue Light Special on those blue shirts for the boys."
There must be a RINO Family Blue Shirt Store.
Here. Here is the real Romney Family photo.
And yes. They are all zombies.
Run for your life.
Do any of these folks live in a Hut in Kenya?
Does he have an Auntie on Welfare in the Projects or an Uncle with a Liquor Store with driving problems?
Can he find his Bircificut (not a misspelling)
If he can’t answer YES to all of the questions above... he is unqualified to be be President /s (really?)
TT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.