Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

See also:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2901768/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2901526/posts

1 posted on 07/01/2012 7:57:30 PM PDT by trekdown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
To: trekdown

Yes indeed!


2 posted on 07/01/2012 7:59:07 PM PDT by kenavi (Obama doesn't hate private equity. He wants to be it with our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

SORRY! This is NOT the job of the Supreme Court! They are suppose to rule on Constitutionality, not anything else!

That means that Roberts did NOT do his duty. Not only that but he disregarded his duty to the Constitution.

Anything else is just an excuse for his vote.

Yes, I am getting madder by the day!!


3 posted on 07/01/2012 8:04:01 PM PDT by Deagle (nOT Get a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

Yep, that’s about it. We need to work hard between now and November!


4 posted on 07/01/2012 8:06:35 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

“That’s undoubtedly what Roberts is telling the nation: Your job, not mine. I won’t make it easy for you.”

Time to impeach the moron.


5 posted on 07/01/2012 8:08:16 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

We can stop the ObamaCareTax with whats in pave now.


6 posted on 07/01/2012 8:08:34 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

All Roberts and the Supreme Court had to do was either find the law Constitutional or unconstitutional. Period. What he did amounts to psycobable.


7 posted on 07/01/2012 8:08:52 PM PDT by FrdmLvr (culture, language, borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown
That’s undoubtedly what Roberts is telling the nation: Your job, not mine.

I respect Krauthammer's mind, but here he's dead wrong. As Scalia, Thomas, Alito and even Kennedy knew, this is exactly the job the Supreme Court exists to do - ruling on the Constitutionality of laws passed by Congress and striking down those which are not in conformance with the US Constitution. Roberts passed on that responsibility and chose to bend his views and the US Constitution like pretzels to find a way to keep this gross imposition on individual freedoms alive. If Roberts doesn't consider this his job, he should never have accepted the nomination.
11 posted on 07/01/2012 8:14:52 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

Does that mean the fact Thief Justice roberts is a duplicitous jackass who actively refused to do his job had nothing to do with it?


12 posted on 07/01/2012 8:16:18 PM PDT by Dr.Zoidberg (With (R)epublicans like these, who needs (D)emocrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown
I don't understand why Krauthammer feels compelled to make excuses for Roberts.
Why did he do it? Because he carries two identities. Jurisprudentially, he is a constitutional conservative. Institutionally, he is chief justice and sees himself as uniquely entrusted with the custodianship of the court’s legitimacy, reputation and stature.
Really? Because by ignoring his own understanding of the illegitimacy of the law, he has damaged the stature of the Supreme Court immeasurably and irredeemably. It makes no sense at all.

Krauthammer himself says he'd have ruled differently.

There is nothing positive about the Roberts ruling, including his motives - whatever they may have been. Achieving a bad result by doing the wrong thing - deliberately - is wrong.

You don't have to be a lawyer or a judge to understand that. John Roberts is either a very bad justice or a very bad man, or both.

14 posted on 07/01/2012 8:19:48 PM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

It appears as though Roberts may have a large cult following. According to the Yahoo front page, Roberts’ ruling has made ObamaCare very popular with “Republicans and independents”.


15 posted on 07/01/2012 8:20:05 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Dude! Where's my Constitution?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

That Miers nomination is looking better and better all the time.


16 posted on 07/01/2012 8:21:59 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

Nope, Roberts nullified the Constitution with this ruling. It will take 2 more Conservatives on the Court to isolate this bastard. No Conservative issue is ever going to get fair hearing as long as the lefty gang of five is there. They will make every lefty crackpot law and lawsuit legal and dismiss a Conservative law and lawsuit as political. This ruling FUBAR any fair hearings in the future.


18 posted on 07/01/2012 8:26:13 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (Roberts has perverted the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown
That’s undoubtedly what Roberts is telling the nation: Your job, not mine.

Then why did Roberts re-write the legislation in the first place?

21 posted on 07/01/2012 8:34:30 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Fools.Damn fools.Welcome to the USSA. Socialism is slavery to the State and the Supreme Court did it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown
Judicial activism is wrong, whether on the lib side or the conservative side.

4 dissenting justices knew this was judicial activism. An appeals court knew this was judicial activism. We know this is judicial activism. Hell, even the 4 dissenting libs knew this was judicial activism.

Roberts knew the law, none better. He knew this was a commerce clause case, he even said it was, but he amended the law to make it a tax case.

The only ones who don't know that this is judicial activism are the Krauthammers and others who are defending this despicable ruling.

23 posted on 07/01/2012 8:38:26 PM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica ("We have prepared for the unbeliever, whips and chains and blazing fires!" Koran Sura 76:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

List o the senate seat that are contested can be found at WIKIpedia. Good chart. We need to get to work.


25 posted on 07/01/2012 8:41:24 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying then or now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown
Roberts tried to vote "present", but came down on the side of being a partisan and not upholding the Constitution.

Changing his vote alienated the conservatives on the Court, screwing the pooch on protecting his inner Rodney King.

Not upholding the Constitution (what happened to the lack of a severability clause in the legislation) and actively rewriting law from the bench shot his legitimacy and legacy with conservative Americans for years to come.

26 posted on 07/01/2012 8:42:28 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

And Roberts is A D A. He opened a door for congress to pass outlandish laws if they have a tax applied!!!


27 posted on 07/01/2012 8:42:56 PM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

Its not Roberts job to anoint winners and losers based on his thought process. He is to rule over constitutionality. He is epic fail. Some could argue his behavior was treasonous.


33 posted on 07/01/2012 8:54:09 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

“Which moron, Roberts or Obama?”other

Brother of another color.


34 posted on 07/01/2012 9:01:35 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: trekdown

If Obamacare had been repealed the economy would have responded in a very positive way. Don’t you think the White House would have take all the credit?! How many voters would realize that the resulting resurgence was IN SPITE of the administration.

I would have certainly preferred that it had been repealed, but you look for whatever bright side you can.

If the GOP can retake the Senate and repeal this monstrosity, then we come out of it with a fully repudiated Democratic Party and a Commerce Clause that has been reigned in by the Supreme Court.


35 posted on 07/01/2012 9:08:30 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson