[philman_36]

Read the decision. Read the dissent.
Golly, gee, I hadn't thought of that.
I've been posting snippets of the decision without having read it. How was I ever able to do that?! /sarcasm

[FredZarguna]

You are posting snippets... wow, very talented.

That doesn't suggest you've actually read them, and indeed, it's quite clear that you either haven't read them, or don't understand what you posted.

The crux of the issue isn't whether the Bill contained taxes; it does. The crux of the issue is whether the individual mandate is justified on the basis of Congress' taxing power.

It isn't.

The actual conservatives on the Court tore you, the blog-pimp, and Roberts a new one.

Stop posting "snippets," and read what Scalia et al think of your ridiculous position. It's crap. The individual mandate is not a tax in ANY SENSE EVER FOUND BY THE USSC.

[FredZarguna]

You are posting snippets... wow, very talented.

That doesn't suggest you've actually read them, and indeed, it's quite clear that you either haven't read them, or don't understand what you posted.

The crux of the issue isn't whether the Bill contained taxes; it does. The crux of the issue is whether the individual mandate is justified on the basis of Congress' taxing power.

It isn't.

The actual conservatives on the Court tore you, the blog-pimp, and Roberts a new one.

Stop posting "snippets," and read what Scalia et al think of your ridiculous position. It's crap. The individual mandate is not a tax in ANY SENSE EVER FOUND BY THE USSC.