Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeff Sessions: Simple GOP majority, strong president all we need to repeal Obamacare
The Daily Caller ^ | June 29, 2012 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 06/29/2012 9:49:46 AM PDT by Rufus2007

On “The Matt Murphy Show” on 100 WAPI in Birmingham, Ala. on Friday, Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee, said that repealing Obamacare in the wake of yesterday’s Supreme Court decision will be easier now that it has been declared constitutional under Congress’ powers of taxation.

Given that the decision has converted the law into a budget issue, Session said he now subscribes to the belief that the Senate will be able to repeal Obamacare with a simple 51 votes, instead of the 60 normally required to overcome a filibuster.

“I believe a simple majority in the Senate with a strong president who leads and some of the abilities we have on budget reconciliation dealing with debt and taxes — I believe could be passed with a simple majority,” Sessions said. “I believe in effect, this legislation can be killed and we need to start over. We need to look at what we need to do to make health care more competitive and less expensive.”

...more (w/audio)...

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bho44; jeffsessions; obama; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
So Romney elected with simple majorities in the House and Senate. Bill gets repealed through Budget reconciliation - does the SCOTUS have to take this up again in 3-4 years to determine if the repeal will be constitutional?
1 posted on 06/29/2012 9:50:00 AM PDT by Rufus2007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Since it was passed under reconciliation, repealing it under the same rules seems like a no-brainer.


2 posted on 06/29/2012 9:57:01 AM PDT by Haiku Guy ("The problem with Internet Quotes is that you never know if they are real" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

I think Sen. Sessions has a valid point here. If I recall correctly, there was a dispute over whether 0bamacare budgeting for 2012 could be altered by act of Congress, and everyone said “no” because is WAS budget reconcilliation or whatever that is.

So, if it is a budget matter, the repeal should not be subject to fillibuster.

My main concern is with Romney’s statement of “repeal and replace.” The concern is that the GOP legislators will fall for the democrat gambit “no repeal until we decide on what to replace it with.” You know that’s how the game will be played. If the GOP falls for that, there will never be a repeal.


3 posted on 06/29/2012 9:57:57 AM PDT by henkster (Why should I care? Why should I care?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Given the size of the loophole Roberts defined in the Constitution through which this Obamacare fiasco could be found to be “constitutional”, no problem with anything ever again being ruled as unconstitutional. The gates are probably down for good now.

All the findings now will be for “legal” or “illegal”. Right and wrong or any moral concept at all have become moot, and case law shall rule from now on.

SCOTUS may not have made itself irrelevant, but they sure painted the institution into a corner.


4 posted on 06/29/2012 10:00:03 AM PDT by alloysteel (Fear and intimidation work. At least on the short term.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Its going to be a major gonad test if we get a pubbie prez, house and senate. They will have no excuses and the artillery fire from the commies will be heavy.


5 posted on 06/29/2012 10:01:15 AM PDT by HerrBlucher ( Don't feed the commies.........your tears. Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Neither Barack Obama, nor Mitt Romney will be a strong POTUS, and the GOP is, still, divided among: conservatives, RINOS, establishment Republicans, elitist Republicans, and Libertarian Republicans.


6 posted on 06/29/2012 10:02:42 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Nice.

A republican president

A republican senate

A republican house

All we’d need would be the will...


7 posted on 06/29/2012 10:03:03 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1256 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Heroes aren't made Frank, they're cornered...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
So Romney elected with simple majorities in the House and Senate. Bill gets repealed through Budget reconciliation ...

Exactly. Not as easy as an outright SCOTUS ban now, which I would have preferred, but probably more effective in the long run (see next point).

does the SCOTUS have to take this up again in 3-4 years to determine if the repeal will be constitutional?

I think this SCOTUS decision eliminates any future constitutional issue. Even the appellate Courts will have to deem a repeal as 'Constitutional' since it is defined as a legislative tax rather than a constitutional question. The question won't even get to SCOTUS again.

8 posted on 06/29/2012 10:03:51 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Let’s assume GOP takes the Senate and the White House, while retaining the House. Romney works with Senate and House, gets the monstrosity repealed in a few days, then take a guess what might happen 4 years later....or eventually.......Dems retake control again.........the ugly monster is put right back on the books again. Sorry, but we are beyond the ballot box for any LASTING solutions. Yeah, I’ll vote but I have no pretentions about a serious solution coming via the ballot box.


9 posted on 06/29/2012 10:04:40 AM PDT by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
Doubt the Supreme Court will have to, does not mean the progressives will not try.

In the meantime we should have fun with this ruling.

Tax everyone over 18 that does not have a personal firearm. Excepting active duty military. Money goes to debt principal and then is apportioned to the State Militias.

Tax everyone over 16 who does not own a internal combustion, highway capable vehicle. Money goes to highway maintenance fund.

Tax everyone over 18 who does have a hunting and/or fishing license. Money goes to national parks and wilderness areas.

See the possibilities?

10 posted on 06/29/2012 10:05:03 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore
Neither Barack Obama, nor Mitt Romney will be a strong POTUS, and the GOP is, still, divided among: conservatives, RINOS, establishment Republicans, elitist Republicans, and Libertarian Republicans.

Not a single Republican voted for Obamacare and Romney is on record multiple times saying he will repeal. So all we need to do is elect Romney and a couple of extra R senators and it's gone.

11 posted on 06/29/2012 10:05:12 AM PDT by KevinB (We'll stop treating Obama like a dog when he stops treating us like a fire hydrant - Fred Grandy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Yes, and therefore if any of the justices will have left the court by the time it comes up for review, the judicial outlook (or, as I prefer to regard it, the integrity) of the new appointments to the court will be critically important.


12 posted on 06/29/2012 10:05:45 AM PDT by Piranha (If you seek perfection you will end up with Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

No because it was determined it was a tax.


13 posted on 06/29/2012 10:06:05 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect
Typing too fast. Tax everyone over 18 who does NOT have a hunting and/or fishing license. Money goes to national parks and wilderness areas.
14 posted on 06/29/2012 10:08:00 AM PDT by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007
A man that defends the blueprint for Obamacare is going to be a strong President that repeals it?

To dream the impossible dream...

15 posted on 06/29/2012 10:10:18 AM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

Zero and his minions will push the “it’s not a tax” line so any attempt to repeal it would need 60 votes in the Senate instead of a simple majority.


16 posted on 06/29/2012 10:10:56 AM PDT by jeffc (Welcome to the United Socialist States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect

Tax everyone who doesn’t own a car. The libs in NYC will love that one. ; )


17 posted on 06/29/2012 10:11:48 AM PDT by Josa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

it ain’t gonna happen “Those nasty republicans - NOW they’re coming for your healthcare!”


18 posted on 06/29/2012 10:15:24 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rufus2007

SCOTUS has pretty much endorsed an institutionalized slave state enforced by the IRS. The government must be severely limited now in it’s ability to tax us and on what to spend our monies on. This is going to take much more than an election to resolve. They will not give up their new and unlimited power over us easily.


19 posted on 06/29/2012 10:24:56 AM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher; alloysteel

Forget Congress! What we need are governors of conservative states to stand up to the feds. We have been duped into thinking changing who is in charge in D.C. will make all the difference, but things have gotten worse no matter which party was in charge.

Nullify now! Threaten to secede, if necessary. Until the states are willing to fight for us, we will continue to be victimized by the federal government.


20 posted on 06/29/2012 10:24:56 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson