Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bayard
Ayup. This is a poll tax. It's against the 24th Amendment.

Info about the "racist" tax.

It also hasn't been litigated in the courts. The case isn't ripe until 2014, when the first tax bills come due. Until then, no court action can happen. Somebody has to pay before anybody has any standing. I wouldn't be surprised to see the whole law tossed out then because it's a poll tax.

7 posted on 06/28/2012 5:31:07 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty
It also hasn't been litigated in the courts. The case isn't ripe until 2014, when the first tax bills come due. Until then, no court action can happen. Somebody has to pay before anybody has any standing. I wouldn't be surprised to see the whole law tossed out then because it's a poll tax.

Nope, the SCOTUS majority said that the mandate was not a tax for purposes of the Anti-Injunction Act, so that challenges to it were ripe now. It then went on to hold that it was a tax for purposes of the Constitution, and upheld it as not being a "direct tax."

The 24th Amendment doesn't come into play here, because not paying the penalty doesn't take away your right to vote.

8 posted on 06/28/2012 5:39:30 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson