Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: klimeckg

That’s what I believe is going on. This was a strategic, purposeful, move by Chief Justice Roberts using the word TAX.

It sounds horrible on its face, but we may be d^&%ing the man(Roberts) too soon.


6 posted on 06/28/2012 8:10:29 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: madison10
That’s what I believe is going on. This was a strategic, purposeful, move by Chief Justice Roberts using the word TAX.

You're really reaching there.

11 posted on 06/28/2012 8:12:42 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: madison10

Damning the man too soon???

Sorry, but with this ruling, Roberts just expanded federal power to unprecidented proportions, it is now conpletely constitutional for the government to MANDATE you buy ANY good or service, for any reason.. regardless of whether you need, want or even can afford it or penalize you for not doing so.

Pacifist? Who cares you now have to buy a gun or pay a tax, and if you can’t pay the tax, you could go to jail.

Vegitarian? Who cares you must now buy $x of BEEF a year or pay a “tax”

Athiest? Who cares you must now buy a rosary or pay a “TAX”

No Drivers LIcense? Who cares you must now buy a car, or pay a “tax”

Don’t watch TV? Who cares you must now buy a TV or pay a “tax”

This isn’t just a political football for one decision for one political cycle, this is a rediculous expansion of federal power beyond ANYTHING the founders intended. No one who has read the Federalist Papers could remotely come to this conclusion.

This decision is just like the Abortion decision, they basically made it up to get the call they wanted, it is inexcusible and a blatantly treasonous act.


21 posted on 06/28/2012 8:19:11 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: madison10

How can the individual mandate as a tax be challenged when the SCOYTUS has already ruled it’s legal?


29 posted on 06/28/2012 8:23:01 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: madison10

How can the individual mandate as a tax be challenged when the SCOTUS has already ruled it’s legal?


30 posted on 06/28/2012 8:23:51 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: madison10

In the majority opinion, Roberts states that the job of the court is to find a way to establish “constitutionality” for any challenged legislation.

It is only when this simply can’t be done that a law is declared unconstitutional.

The majority did establish that constitutionality, then, by viewing Obamacare as a “tax” (with all sorts of interesting political ramifications, heh-heh)

But there was no politically strategic motivation on Roberts’ part, IMHO. That said, we are now well-armed going into November’s election. If we come out of that with the White House and both houses of Congress, Obamacare will be wiped out.


43 posted on 06/28/2012 9:30:34 AM PDT by Walrus (ICH BIN EIN ARIZONAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson