[Ocean_Living]

You actually think Romney would choose Van Jones to lead anything? Or refuse to prosecute the new black panthers for voter intimidation? Really?

Mitt has said over and over that a national mandate is unconstitutional.

At this point in the game, attacking Mitt has the exact same result as endorsing Obama. The mods should start deleting posts for endorsing the freak.

[Halfmanhalfamazing]

——————You actually think Romney would choose Van Jones to lead anything? Or refuse to prosecute the new black panthers for voter intimidation? Really? ——————

It’s a fair question to ask.

Obama just trampled the constitution, and here’s Romney’s milquetoast non-response:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2895911/posts

Translation: Romney is a progressive. Oh wait, you already knew that BECAUSE YOU SAW THE VIDEO OF HIM ADMITTING IT!

[wita]

#1. “You actually think Romney would choose Van Jones to lead anything? Or refuse to prosecute the new black panthers for voter intimidation?” Really?

Based on your arrival date, my advice would be to go back to post 42, see who number #42 was addressed too, determine what was quoted out of number 34 and then try to make your comments related to the subject.

If I understand your point, which is really asking a lot, I don’t think you understand mine.

#2. “The mods should start deleting posts for endorsing the freak”.

On this forum, based on at least two years of data, it would be pure guess work to determine out of the two individuals in question, what “freak” you are talking about.