Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 Worst Cars of All Time
thestreet ^ | 6-2012 | ted reed

Posted on 06/13/2012 9:59:05 AM PDT by doug from upland

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last
To: US Navy Vet

I owned a 79 Ford Fairmont. Great car if you ask me. put 150K miles on it. Didn’t need much work at all.
Oh yeah, it was cool. Two tone with pumpkin colored soft top. Power windows too.


181 posted on 06/13/2012 1:43:10 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy (Trust in God, but empty the clip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Yep.


182 posted on 06/13/2012 1:43:44 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: pfflier
Over the course of a few years, Pontiac got everything just about perfect with the Fiero, then having done so, they decided in 1988 that there was simply no future or profit in a small, lower end, two seat sports car.

The following year, Mazda introduced the Miata.

183 posted on 06/13/2012 1:49:10 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: RightField
You post reminded me of the Nissan Micra.
184 posted on 06/13/2012 1:53:45 PM PDT by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51

You == Your


185 posted on 06/13/2012 1:56:50 PM PDT by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven
Lucas electrical system?


186 posted on 06/13/2012 2:02:53 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: kosciusko51
Nice video. I never heard of that car.

I saw this guy ahead of me and as I took the pictures, I was planning on putting them up on FR eventually. I doubt if the guy is a Freeper.


187 posted on 06/13/2012 2:06:53 PM PDT by RightField (one of the obstreperous citizens insisting on incorrect thinking - C. Krauthamer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
No question about that.

There was another generation of Cougars that were ugly turkeys though, and this one destroyed the name: 1999-2002, based on the Ford Contour/Mercury Mystique of all cars (themselves failures in those incarnations; they replaced the Ford Tempo/Mercury Topaz) . . .


188 posted on 06/13/2012 2:37:01 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

I always drove Firebirds during that time period. It’s just I never had a hate-on for the Stang II. The engine sucked but it wasn’t ugly.


189 posted on 06/13/2012 2:52:22 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

I looked with envy as the 86 Fiero came out with the V-6 and redone suspension. Lesson learned: Never by the first model year of a new car.


190 posted on 06/13/2012 3:02:13 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I agree. I think the Mustang II has nice lines.


191 posted on 06/13/2012 3:06:42 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Wasn’t ugly?

The year without a V8.

Compared with the original, the Mustang II is indeed ugly.  Never mind other generations of Mustang.

192 posted on 06/13/2012 3:07:50 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
I had a Cooper Mini as a rental one time. Same thing...a speedometer as big as a dinner plate in the center console.
193 posted on 06/13/2012 3:08:50 PM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (Pictionary at the Rorschach's tonight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
I never needed replacement smoke for my '77 Triumph Spitfire.
It generated same 24/7. LOL ...
194 posted on 06/13/2012 3:12:48 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The 65 Stang is a work of art, that doesn’t mean the stang II is totally ugly. It is acceptable. I mean people actually bought gremlins. We called them moonliners.


195 posted on 06/13/2012 3:15:03 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

PS I just took delivery of a '13 stang just like this car.

196 posted on 06/13/2012 3:21:54 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

PS I just took delivery of a '13 stang just like this car.

197 posted on 06/13/2012 3:22:15 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
My German landlord's favorite joke:

Q: What's the smallest car in the world?

A: The R3, it only holds one!

198 posted on 06/13/2012 3:26:31 PM PDT by Feckless (I was trained by the US << This Tagline Censored by FR >> ain't that irOnic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The duration of a brand is its judge. The Mustang II ran for four years, since it was one car disguised as another. Those that deliberately go for subcompacts such as the Gremlin aren’t looks-conscious, otherwise the original Toyota Corolla wouldn’t have gotten off the ground and the Gremlin wouldn’t have had an eight-year run (and AFAICS, the second-generation Corolla had a very large influence on the looks of US subcompacts).


199 posted on 06/13/2012 3:32:07 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It’s remarkable that we are now in a period where the six-cylinder pony cars have more horsepower than the base small-block V8s of the past, even some of the ones from the 60s. Who would have thought of a 305-horsepower six-cylinder Mustang even in 1969-70?


200 posted on 06/13/2012 3:36:04 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson