[OrangeHoof]

The media pretends that their is no schism in the Democrats like there is in the GOP but there has been a feud for almost 20 years between the "Kennedy wing" and the "Clinton wing". Go back to 2007 when Hillary seemed to be awaiting her coronation when this little Chicago upstart named Obama decides to challenge her.

Obama doesn't really get traction until Ted Kennedy decides to endorse him and puts the whole "Kennedy wing" power behind him. Suddenly, Obama becomes some Kennedy-like "messiah" to the media and Hillary becomes old news.

The Clintons, always seeking power, settle for Secretary of State but have been laying in wait for their chance to push Obama out of the way and they now see their opportunity. Many of the Obama critics from the Democrat Party (though not all) have been Clinton cronies.

But you make a really good point that Obama has few friends. Very few people seem close or loyal to Obama the way Clinton has had loyalists.

I guess the true test of a messiah doesn't come until after the crucifixion. Somehow, I'm guessing Obama doesn't "rise again".

[SoFloFreeper]

What is really the untold story (by the media) is that Hitlery got MORE VOTES in the primary season than Obamugabe.

She, by all rights, should be the President. (She would have kicked McInsane’s ass.)

[cardinal4]

I guess the true test of a messiah doesn't come until after the crucifixion. Somehow, I'm guessing Obama doesn't "rise again".

Very good analogy..

[Salgak]

And what’s really amusing, is that the so-called “Birther” argument was started by Hillary’s campaign.

I’m sure she and Bill are laughing at the Ear Leader behind his back. . . .

[cardinal4]

I guess the true test of a messiah doesn't come until after the crucifixion. Somehow, I'm guessing Obama doesn't "rise again".

Very good analogy..