Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MacMattico

Likewise, I think a convention coup is unlikely and inadvisable. No one likes Romney, but we realize that the alternative is far worse. Think about it—in 92 Clinton beat GHWB by 4%, with Perot garnering 19%. If not for Perot, we would have never had Clinton, probably a different nominee than Dole in 96, and no GWB in 2000. True, the Republican takeover in 94 may not have been as drastic, but we would have had a RINO with a conservative congress. The one fly in the ointment would have been 4 more years of Quayle as VP, who had no shot at the Presidency. Perhaps a Gingrich or Delay would have run in 96. The events of the past 2 decades could have been much different. As much as it pains us, and as nauseating as it is, we need to get behind Romney and oppose Obama with all we’ve got.


72 posted on 05/30/2012 6:25:51 AM PDT by Freestate316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Freestate316
Likewise, I think a convention coup is unlikely and inadvisable.
“No one likes Romney”

How pathetic. We are not only suppose to vote for a pro-abortion, anti-gun, engineer of gay marriage and the person who gave us our first taste of national healthcare; but also someone no one likes- except for Rove, Coulter, Drudge,.....the Rino’s. I have yet to meet ANYONE who not only likes Willard, but is excited about him. I just called the RNC to let them know I am not going to be a delegate after all, I will not back romney.

73 posted on 05/30/2012 7:13:29 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson