Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spaceship Enterprise in 20 years? Beam me up!
MSNBC | Universe Today ^ | 5/12/12 | Nancy Atkinson

Posted on 05/13/2012 12:58:02 AM PDT by LibWhacker

Website lays out detailed plans to make a Star Trek fan's dream come true

In Star Trek lore, the first Starship Enterprise will be built by the year 2245. But today, an engineer has proposed — and outlined in meticulous detail — building a full-sized, ion-powered version of the Enterprise complete with 1G of gravity on board, and says it could be done with current technology, within 20 years.

"We have the technological reach to build the first generation of the spaceship known as the USS Enterprise — so let's do it," writes the curator of the Build The Enterprise website, who goes by the name of BTE Dan.

This "Gen1" Enterprise could get to Mars in 90 days, to the moon in three, and "could hop from planet to planet dropping off robotic probes of all sorts en masse — rovers, special-built planes and satellites,” BTE Dan says.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: 20years; enterprise; iondrive; starship; startrek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: njslim
Where are the phasers...?

Right here.

21 posted on 05/13/2012 9:01:28 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan
The moon, the asteroid belt, mars, they all have water and minerals in some form. Some one has to be first, some one has to lead.

This country was never greater, then when we had a frontier.

Staying "land locked" will result in one thing, stagnation. Look around, this planet is stagnating, people have no where to dream of, no place to conquer.

22 posted on 05/13/2012 9:24:46 AM PDT by Kakaze (Exterminate Islamofacism and apologize for nothing....except not doing it sooner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kakaze

Columbus wasn’t headed to the orient in order to pick up the same items that he could get at home, at 500 times the cost.

What you are proposing is no more rational at this point than colonizing Antartica, the Sahara, or the bottom of the ocean. Indeed, it is quite a bit less rational than colonizing those places, which also have water and minerals in some form, and much cheaper to get at than an aseroid.


23 posted on 05/13/2012 12:57:07 PM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson