If not Romney, then .. who?

self ^ | April 30, 2012 | knarf

[netmilsmom]

:-)

I’m amazed that FReepers are in the dark as much as they are.

[Errant]

Are you paying attention?

Are You?

That chart you easily dismissed is telling me that what we've been doing, picking the lessor of two evils, ain't working.

How many times do we continue doing the same thing over and over, expecting a different result?

[netmilsmom]

I’m paying attention to more than you are.

Because I see a bigger picture than Planned Parenthood. I’m out there with the yellow balloons, standing with other Pro-lifers who are on the front line. I see it in a big picture.

You’re seeing a chart. I’m seeing the small strides we HAVE made coming because of conservative judges. Four more years of Obama will kill more Preborn. Perhaps even born. Ever hear of the “Born Alive Act”?

[Shimmer1]

Which one is which?

[Hegewisch Dupa]

Ever hear of the “Born Alive Act”?

If there was no difference between obama and the mitt-wit except for this one fact, it would prove enough for any human to vote to keep the obama thing from leaving a baby to die. Unless of course a person's pretend pride takes precedent.

[Kevmo]

Better to have 4 more years of a librul followed by a conservative than 8 years of a RINO. The fastest path to a conservative in the office.

[netmilsmom]

Amen.

[Errant]

Glad to hear you're fired up and working to save the unborn!

So don't let them shove an abortion advocate down your throat.

Have the faith and courage to vote your conscious. If we do, it will save the unborn and our country in the long run.

[Raider Sam]

No, but writing about it the way you did does raise some eyebrows.

[Raider Sam]

Maybe a “protest too much” type of thing.

[alarm rider]

Good on you. I will not fear, and I will vote, but not for Mitt. I am really sick of the cowardly “sky will fall if we don’t vote for Mitt” bunch.

[netmilsmom]

LifeNews sees him differently than you do.
http://www.lifenews.com/2012/04/19/planned-parenthood-video-attacks-romneys-pro-life-views/

Personally, in the big picture, Obama is a disaster for life.
Please see the big picture.

[Errant]

Please see the big picture.

I do...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CUL8I3KZO4&feature=autoplay&list=PLE679517D09F64A71&playnext=3

[netmilsmom]

If you are basing everything on that YouTube, no you aren’t.

http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/aug/08081209

[mo]

I don’t know what to tell folks who still in all sincerity believe there is a functional, representative “Two-Party” system in the USA today.

there IS one, sort of, ...HOWEVER...it is the DC RinoCrat Uni-Party vs Flyover Country. Its advantage is that it is somewhat stealthy. Which is why We the People keep coming up on the short end of the stick.

Cast your votes accordingly.....see my tag line...

[Errant]

I don't see how you can get any more fairer than to allow the man in his own words, spoken during a calm interview, by a fair minded interviewer who allowed him plenty of time to explain his past and current position.

Did you even watch it???

[netmilsmom]

Yes, I watched it. It’s from 2007 and is one man. Unless it’s President Obama, we do not have a dictatorship. He can have ideas and wishes but with a conservative congress and a conservative Supreme Court, that’s all they are.

How well do you think the Pro-Life movement will do with Obama, a conservative congress and a liberal court?

There is a much bigger picture that Romney and if there were ANYONE who could win against Obama, I would be there. MR is my dead last choice, but when I have the Slovaks in my church telling me that they are seeing the same signs in this guy as they saw back home, it has to be anyone who has a chance to beat Obama. The Chaldeans are terrified (being Arab Christian they know they are the first targets). Survival is first. This isn’t Bill Clinton we are talking about.

I’ll tell you what, FReepmail me your address and I will buy you a copy of this..
http://agendadocumentary.com/

They showed it at our church on Sunday. Many Slovaks were in tears. Our pastor and assistant pastor, both of which lived under communism worked to screen it with us.

[upchuck]

Very unfortunately, Jim DeMint said a long time ago he does not want to run.

[Graewoulf]

But that doesn’t mean that he wouldn’t run for the “Good of the Country,” if drafted by an open Convention.

[Antoninus]

This started under Bush, socializing our country and has accelerated multi-fold under BO. Stop looking at the panem et circenses and open your eyes.

Nonsense. The socializing of our country started, in earnest, under Johnson. Every president since, except Reagan, has accelerated the process. I'm done supporting those who are just more of the same.

Did you miss where Obama told Putin to be patient until his “next election”?

What in Romney's record gives you the ability to trust that he would be different on foreign affairs?

Did you know that members of the Muslim Brotherhood are working in the administration on national security concerns?

What in Romney's record gives you the ability to trust that he wouldn't also allow this?

Did you miss that two of our Supreme Court justices are getting up there in years? (ahem to be replace with Wise Latinas?)

What in Romney's record gives you the ability to trust that he would make conservative appointments?

How about the ‘Executive orders” skipping congress?

What in Romney's record gives you the ability to trust that he would act differently?

How about the Agencies like the EPA destroying lives? Or the Justice Department looking away from “Fast and Furious” and the Black Pathers?

What in Romney's record gives you the ability to trust that he would act differently?

Are you beginning to see the problem? You have chosen to trust a man who has shown himself to be utterly unworthy of trust. You are doing so out of fear and you have a right to do so.

But don't ask me to call your motive anything other than fear.

Those who vote based on fear are no different from medieval serfs who put themselves under the protection of the strongest lord to protect them from more rapacious ones. Is that truly what we have become?