They probably consider the M-1 Garand to be an assault weapon.
Indeed, they refered to bolt action rifles as they were speaking of assault weapons.
My point was that when a liberal talks about “certain guns”, it means that judges can interprete whatever they want, and that liberals LIE ALL THE TIME. What they mean is any gun.
The reason for this is because liberals are paranoiacs and natural backstabbers. As a result of the chaos in their head, they have given up on caring or maintaining a “healthy pack”, and, thus, they are looking for a leader to do the talking to them, because, if there is none to send them to the controled “Gulag by installments” that Obamacare is, they go crazy.
The reactions of crazies like Loughner or Trayvis are the examples of a liberal ashamed to be such dependent and yet incapable at the time of depending.
This is why they always are viewed as victims, ie. as “poor animals” who would if only we paid them taxes to watch TV in some sort of prison, without any responsabilities or “worries”.
Now, a Garand with a few en bloc clips of black tips is an assault weapon in my book.....a vest is no match for them.