Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Hodar
It has to do with the quantity of combustable fuel available.

Ok but given a presumably abundant quantity of combustible fuel that feeds the "excess" -- that is, the flare -- what was this quantity doing in the previous second? Why did it not ignite exactly when it was at the quantity, or the density, that feeds the later even flames? Why is it lying there waiting to feed a flare?

Would you say that the heat that is released when the fire ignites, reaches out to acquire more oxygen than subsequent flames have available? Or is something else going on?

It's curious that the change of state from non-fire to fire is explosive rather than gradual -- and yet it's gradual just before it actually combusts.

25 posted on 04/09/2012 2:31:53 PM PDT by Lady Lucky (Romney, the pink slime of presidential politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lady Lucky
It's curious that the change of state from non-fire to fire is explosive rather than gradual -- and yet it's gradual just before it actually combusts.

Remove the accelarant - and you will have a dramatically slow combustion. If you were a boy scout, and had to spend time rubbing sticks, or using a flint with kindling - you would see that under 'normal' conditions, fire starts quite slowly, and builds. What you are seeing is the application of accelerants - which "accelerate" the combustion. Again, light a candle, light some leaves, light paper, cardboard or kindling. Without an accelerant, it's a slow, blistering and painful process.

67 posted on 04/10/2012 6:00:00 AM PDT by Hodar ( Who needs laws; when this FEELS so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson