[SunkenCiv]

These are submerged formations. If the Noachian Deluge had submerged ‘em, they would now be above water.

[ForGod'sSake]

These are submerged formations. If the Noachian Deluge had submerged ‘em, they would now be above water.

I KNEW I should have checked in earlier. Your reply probably makes perfect sense, so I'm going to claim a brain freeze due to misfiring synapses and call a time out because I can't even fathom what you're trying to say. Maybe the fog will clear overnight and I'll be able to respond with something approaching coherence in the light of day. G'night...

[ForGod'sSake]

FWIW, after some additional digging around the web I gather the Scientific Community™ has not reached consensus on WHEN or even IF a mega flood occurred during modern Man's existence; how LARGE it was; that is to say, how WIDESPREAD; how much DESTRUCTION was caused, etc. Most can't even agree that the hundreds of flood "myths" from around the world are worthy of anything more than a cursory yawn. So, just what defines the Pleistocene/Holocene boundary? Is it related? From most accounts the events at the P/H boundary were catastrophic(hence, the boundary); including floods, widespread volcanism, probably magnetic shifts, plate upheavals, and more I'm sure. What if anything triggered these events or was it just time for another planetary disruption?

Being an old salesman I'm far from an expert but based on my observations alone I have an opinion about the state of science and academia generally. To the layman it looks like their sole purpose for being is to discount others' work. Much like lawyers, they expend their energies arguing their cases in academic courtrooms. Full of sound and fury but signifying nothing. They're mostly hacking at the branches in an effort at relevance. Job security.

No offense intended for those few who are pursuing noble causes and genuine science; whomever and wherever they may be.

I entertained notions of significantly revising and extending my remarks then thought, WTH!